Sam here and i had to look up who kenjit is? still not quit sure.i'm not trying to get new age as i have never been new age.l believe that the music we listen to even on top notch systems somehow falls short and if i find the right formula there can be a supernatural experience between the listener and the music. based on the two audio samples from my post i believe i proved that frequencies can have a pronounced effect on the sound of music.when i use the term natural what i really mean is a supernatural connection to the music something man made equipment can't produce.l believe there is an answer and i believe it is a very simple answer i simply have to uncover it.
to my ears digital audio does not sound natural? something is wrong!
lf Digital audio is man made how can I expect the brain to recognize it as natural sounding?
lf I re-encode digital audio with the earths natural frequencies will the brain now recognize it as a natural source allowing the digital audio to harmonize with my brain creating an entirely new listening experience?
This might sound crazy however it sounds perfectly logical to me so i went to the park at 3am to record the frequencies of nature using the built in mic on my cheap mp3 player in wav 16/44 and uploaded the wav file to my pc and while the file from the park was playing on my windows media player i made a simple copy of a commercial digital album flac 16/44 on my desktop and here are the results using the same audio source.
commercial release flac 16/44 http://u.pc.cd/PmXctalK
commercial release with earth frequencies http://u.pc.cd/7d7
lt may be the placebo effect and i'm hearing what i want to hear however i think the music is now in harmony with my ears?
lf I re-encode digital audio with the earths natural frequencies will the brain now recognize it as a natural source allowing the digital audio to harmonize with my brain creating an entirely new listening experience?
This might sound crazy however it sounds perfectly logical to me so i went to the park at 3am to record the frequencies of nature using the built in mic on my cheap mp3 player in wav 16/44 and uploaded the wav file to my pc and while the file from the park was playing on my windows media player i made a simple copy of a commercial digital album flac 16/44 on my desktop and here are the results using the same audio source.
commercial release flac 16/44 http://u.pc.cd/PmXctalK
commercial release with earth frequencies http://u.pc.cd/7d7
lt may be the placebo effect and i'm hearing what i want to hear however i think the music is now in harmony with my ears?
- ...
- 67 posts total
A riddle that always has me foxed is why some people think digital recordings cut to LP and played back don't sound 'digital'. It seems to me that if inherently digits 'digitise' a recording then that will be faithfully reproduced by the LP. Or does the LP magically add 'undigital' artifacts to the sound that can somehow negative the 'digital' sound and make it 'nice' again? This is beginning to seem like hogwash. Separately, if music is recorded at a high enough sampling rate and bit count then the crude graphical zig-zag of a lo-quality digital recording will transform to the beautiful curves of analog and it should no longer be possible to hear any 'digital' artifact. All digital is not inherently bad; only poorly implemented digital (which admittedly is a lot of it) |
clearthinker A riddle that always has me foxed is why some people think digital recordings cut to LP and played back don’t sound ’digital’. >>>>Most likely for the same reason a lot of people don’t think CDs sound “digital.” 😄 |
- 67 posts total