Choice of Phono Cartridges


I am looking to buy a new phono cartridge in the $450 to $550 price range. Lots to choose from, but I'm looking for some advice on what might be best for my current analog rig. System consists of:

Audio-Technica AT-LP7 table with AT-VMN20EB cartridge
Project Tube Box DS phono amp
BAT VK 42se Preamp
BAT VK 250 Power amp
Apogee Duetta Signature speakers
Paradigm reference Servo Subs

I'm thinking about the following cartridges:

Sumiko Blue Point Special EVO-III mc at $549
Sumiko Blue Point #2 at $449
Hana E mc at $475
Sound Smith Otello ES at $400
Ortofon 2M Bronze mm at $440
Ortofon MC Quintet Blue at $524
Audio-Technica AT-OC9XML mc at $549
Clearaudio Performer V2 at $450

I realize that it's a long list, but I'd like to hear from any of you who might have had any experience with these cartridges and any advice you can give. I have a collection of around 2000 LP's and want to improve on the current SQ of the AT-LP7. 

Or, maybe I should invest in anew TT at around $1,000 to $1,200?

Thanks in advance for your input.

Richard
 
richmos
Unfortunately they are all fragile, even those short gemstone cantilevers (the most exoensive). 

According to cartridge designer (Mr. Reto Adrioli of the Bluelectric) the aluminum is the best to work with. Japanese school of cartridge designers is a proof of that when it comes to MC. 

Looking for relatively cheap MM cartridges with aluminum cantilever it would be great to have a "nude" line contact type of the diamond for better reproduction and longer stylus life (less record wear too). 

If a cartridge have not only great stylus shape (at least shibata) but also great cantilever (beryllium was great) then the whole moving mass system will be much lower, as the result - the sound will be refined too (also better tracking because if the higher compliance). 

However, Stanton/Pickering acheved amazing sound with aluminum cantilever and their patented Stereohedron stylus. Everything depends on particular cartridge design. 

At the same time Technics with their best MM and MC ended up with Boron Pipe after serious research: "Somewhere in the high frequencies, every cartridge has an undesirable resonance point where the frequency response curve climbs a sudden peak. If that peak is in the audible range, your records sound not as intended. That resonance frequency is determined by the total effective moving mass of the vibrating system - the summed masses of the diamond stylus and, most importantly, the cantilever and magnet, etc. To shift that harmful resonance frequency up into the high supersonics, the effective moving mass must be reduced to the lowest possible minimum. Also, too much effective moving mass increases the mechanical impedance, thereby negatively affecting the cartridge's tracing ability."









Wow, lot's of information for me to sort through and research. Thanks for all the input.  I'm going to continue working in both directions - that is looking at a new TT or keeping the AT and replacing the cartridge. We'll see how the math works out and how that equals better sounding vinyl playback.

Richard
FWIW, if lowest moving mass is the Holy Grail, then MI cartridges ( not MC types) are the road to Nirvana. And incidentally MI types typically produce higher signal voltage than LOMC. Easier for the phono stage. Grado and Soundsmith are modern sources of MI cartridges.
I remember Peter Ledermann (SoundSmith) has mentioned Walter Stanton MI design and some other cartridges when i asked him about clever design from the past. 

Regarding cartridge and tonearm systems resonance frequency, Richard, you have to read this: 

https://www.ortofon.com/support/support-hifi/resonance-frequency/
Dear @richmos : I think that rigth now you AT TT/tonearm combination is fine to stay with. The tonearm design looks as one of the best tonearm ever made that's the Technics EPA 100MK2, even your AT tonearm comes with the best VTA mechanism ever made where today 20K+ tonearms not even dreams with.
That VTA mechanism was designed by Technics in the very old times of analog audio. So for me stay with and before you change it ( if you do in the future. ) your choice for a better wuality cartridge is spot on.

I agree with the gentleman that recomended Nagaoka cartridges that's like AT or Ortofon manufacturers an " old " way experimented manufacturer too.

You must try this one and I'm sure you can't go wrong with:

https://www.lpgear.com/product/NAGAOKAMP300.html

Due that the AT tonearm designs is a removable headshell design you can match the cartridge with the tonearm for improved quality performance levels.
You can use a different headshells than the stock AT, you can choose for magnesium build material to wood one or even headshells of blended materials. 
With different headshells the kind of sound you will listen is different too.
Even if you don't want to test with other headshells you can improve the sound changing the headshell stock wires for better quality wires.

Anyway, as you posted: "  lot's of information for me to sort through and research .""


Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.