Why do most phono preamps lack XLR input even thought cartridges are naturally balanced?


Seems to me XLR input is the way to go for phono preamps.  Pros and cons for XLR vs RCA phono input?
dracule1
roberttdid
Except with a phono input, you don’t gain 6db, as it is an application specific input. It amplifies the difference between the two leads. There is no "differential" output that has 2x the signal level (6 db).
I do not know what you mean by "application specific input" or why this matter isn’t more clear to you.

My phono preamp gain is adjustable and is spec’d up to a maximum of 68 dB single ended and 74 dB balanced. That seems consistent with my experience.
 To clarify, I can only add the specs for my Ayre P-5xe: the gain for the balanced output is 6 dB higher than single ended out for each of the 3 gain selections. However the gain does NOT change with the choice of RCA or XLR inputs. You should be able to look up the specs and recommended phono cable wirings on the Ayre website in the manual download.  The specs are minimal and no S:N specs are given.
oldears
...the specs for my Ayre P-5xe: the gain for the balanced output is 6 dB higher than single ended out for each of the 3 gain selections. However the gain does NOT change with the choice of RCA or XLR inputs ...
Thank you! Exactly. That’s been one of my points from the beginning of this thread; the choice of connector has nothing inherently to do with whether the circuit is balanced (or not) or differential (or not).

And one of the best places to use differential circuits is in the phono section, for both higher gain and better immunity to noise.
I have a very fine Audio Research PH-2 that is balanced in and out....And it works like it should.........
Luisma31 7-9-2020

... playing with the Mogami interconnects I noticed no hum, not even the faintest hum with the XLR in place BUT when unplugged one of the XLR’s from the preamp and amp on, disconnecting from the pre there was a nasty hum, this is not supposed to happen, then I remembered when ordering these Mogami’s interconnects everyone said better to be shielded and at no cost I got them JSSG (looped shield at the ends), there was one guy don’t remember where online which told me before all this, for balanced interconnects never get these shielded but since it was only ONE guy I did not.Replaced the balanced interconnects (between pre and amp) with unshielded ones and when unplugging one end the hum was gone, but the buzz was still there.My source DAC was connected to the pre via XLR shielded, looped interconnects and even with the DAC OFF there was buzz, replaced these and the buzz was gone almost completely,

... I described hum with a shielded balanced cable when unplugged from the pre side, when an unshielded cable was used there was no hum, my understanding is the shield adds capacitance and IMO is not needed and undesirable.

Kijanki 7-9-2020
You keep saying "unplugged from pre side" but you probably mean that shield was disconnected, otherwise what are you listening to if nothing is connected to pre?


@luisma31 @kijanki

If I am interpreting correctly (and I’m not sure that I am), I believe Luis is saying that completely disconnecting the "looped," shielded, and balanced preamp-to-amp cable from the preamp (not just disconnecting the shield) resulted in hum and buzz. While doing the same thing with an unshielded cable resulted in buzz but no hum. And replacing the "looped," shielded, and balanced DAC-to-preamp cable with an unshielded one essentially resolved the remaining buzz.

Also, I believe that when Luis refers to a shield being "looped" he simply means that it is not connected at the corresponding end.

If those interpretations are correct I would not attribute the differing results to differences in capacitance. Consistent with one of Kijanki’s comments I cannot envision a means by which high interconnect cable capacitance (within reason of course, and the capacitance of Mogami, even in stock form with the shield not looped, is certainly well within reason) could result in hum or buzz. But on the other hand I can certainly envision that a cable of any type hanging off of the input of a component, while not being connected to a signal source, could result in hum as a result of EMI effects, depending on the design of the specific component and the specific cable, as well as on the surrounding EMI environment. And likewise when the cable is connected at both ends but the source of the signal is turned off (assuming the component providing the signal is not one of the relatively few designs in which the output is grounded via a relay when the component is turned off).

Also, while Luis describes the shields as being "looped" I’ll mention FWIW that in a conventionally designed balanced cable (i.e., one in which the shield or some other kind of conductor connects XLR pin 1 at one end to XLR pin 1 at the other end), the resistance of that shield or other kind of conductor can significantly affect the degree of hum and buzz that may result from ground loops. That would also depend on whether the components connect pin 1 to chassis (as they should) or to circuit ground (as is often incorrectly done), as well as on the relation (i.e., the impedance between) circuit ground and chassis ground within the components.

The bottom line: As I and others have said in past threads it is often ***very*** easy in audio to attribute an observed difference to the wrong variable. And that is especially likely to be the case when the observations involve a very limited number of components, cables, and circumstances. I believe that in this case differences in cable capacitance were not the cause of the observed differences.

Regards,
-- Al