SS might be more accurate, tonal balanced, refined, dynamic,,, is my guess, anda position held by the SS community.
Yet in my experiences and for my taste, the choice is very simple, ~~Tubes~~~ always and forever,,,= I have no interest whatsoever to consider employing SS amplification.
IMHO SS is old dinosaurish technology,,which we had no choice but to use back in the day,,,Maraztn, Rotel, NAD, Nachimishi, Krell.
nahhh I ;'ll forgo your beliefs that SS has tonal superiority, dynamics, superior sonics~~ over my tube selection,, Yeah guess I'll hang with the tube-let-down-sound, Oh how dull and boring is the tube sound vs the spectacular, stunning, wonderful world of SS experiences..Ohh what I am missing out on.
Yeah I'll stay with the loser-tube sound.
Snakeoil buster here
Yet in my experiences and for my taste, the choice is very simple, ~~Tubes~~~ always and forever,,,= I have no interest whatsoever to consider employing SS amplification.
IMHO SS is old dinosaurish technology,,which we had no choice but to use back in the day,,,Maraztn, Rotel, NAD, Nachimishi, Krell.
nahhh I ;'ll forgo your beliefs that SS has tonal superiority, dynamics, superior sonics~~ over my tube selection,, Yeah guess I'll hang with the tube-let-down-sound, Oh how dull and boring is the tube sound vs the spectacular, stunning, wonderful world of SS experiences..Ohh what I am missing out on.
Yeah I'll stay with the loser-tube sound.
Snakeoil buster here