Mr. djones51
You are tiring me out Mr. djones51.
Consider this answer to be the last !
Haven’t seen any explanations of your source for the AWG table or the errores calc.
A 105 for DF is not that much of a DF. But as this is what it is, let’s do it:
105 DF = 8/105 = 0.076 Ohms as Ro.
If using a #16 awg cable (6 ft) = 0.048 ohms as R cable.
Add the DF (Ro) and the cable (R):
0.076 + 0.048 = 0.124 ohms
0.124 ohms equals to a combined DF of 8 / 0.124 = 64
So, by you using a #16 you are losing 40% of the original DF of that Amp (105).
Is 40% still insignificant?
But why 105?
Do it with a DF of 400 ! (there are guys gere with Amps of 800 and even 4000)
400 DF = 8 / 400 = 0.02 ohms.
With a # 16 awg you lose 70% and so on...
(you claim its insignificant, so I take the liberty of using a #16 awg) .
Is that significant enough for you?
Most of cables out there are of #12 awg, for the convenience of making them,
rather of: being significant for the task...
Would you like that attitude when sitting on the dentist chair, or at a bypass surgery? That would be a first.
With a #12 awg, you about to lose 50%!
I can understand that you can cut your loss in advance, if you go to gamble Vegas or buy some shares.
It's a game with chances to WIN but also to LOSE.
Is 50% loss on the sound is insignificant for you?
Sticking to your thin cables,
you only lose! (unfair)
No WIN !!!
You are tiring me out Mr. djones51.
Consider this answer to be the last !
Haven’t seen any explanations of your source for the AWG table or the errores calc.
A 105 for DF is not that much of a DF. But as this is what it is, let’s do it:
105 DF = 8/105 = 0.076 Ohms as Ro.
If using a #16 awg cable (6 ft) = 0.048 ohms as R cable.
Add the DF (Ro) and the cable (R):
0.076 + 0.048 = 0.124 ohms
0.124 ohms equals to a combined DF of 8 / 0.124 = 64
So, by you using a #16 you are losing 40% of the original DF of that Amp (105).
Is 40% still insignificant?
But why 105?
Do it with a DF of 400 ! (there are guys gere with Amps of 800 and even 4000)
400 DF = 8 / 400 = 0.02 ohms.
With a # 16 awg you lose 70% and so on...
(you claim its insignificant, so I take the liberty of using a #16 awg) .
Is that significant enough for you?
Most of cables out there are of #12 awg, for the convenience of making them,
rather of: being significant for the task...
Would you like that attitude when sitting on the dentist chair, or at a bypass surgery? That would be a first.
With a #12 awg, you about to lose 50%!
I can understand that you can cut your loss in advance, if you go to gamble Vegas or buy some shares.
It's a game with chances to WIN but also to LOSE.
Is 50% loss on the sound is insignificant for you?
Sticking to your thin cables,
you only lose! (unfair)
No WIN !!!