Dear Raul,
the MF article is 6 years old.
Wally tried to determine UNI-DIN in the vinyl-engine calculator and tried to compare it with the stipulation of Loefgren. It is not only far away from reality, I guess Wally did not understand UNI-DIN (same with you?).
Mathematically and under the assumption that the tracking parameters were the same on each LP-side Loefgrens Euclidian Approaching would be correct! As either the one nor the other is correct the bases for the calculation is not right - especially not for Stereo!
UNI-DIN was accomplished on the bases of a Stereo-Microgroove LP. The Stereo track, nor 33 1/3 or 45 rpm existed at the time of Loefgren ´s calculation. The same for Baerwald.
When you want enjoying a LP with all tracks you better move to UNI-DIN, also regarding the last songs on the record.
MIchael Fremer knew why he did not prefer one of the curves at Wally´s miscalculation. Maybe today Michael would see it in a different light?
Best
E.
the MF article is 6 years old.
Wally tried to determine UNI-DIN in the vinyl-engine calculator and tried to compare it with the stipulation of Loefgren. It is not only far away from reality, I guess Wally did not understand UNI-DIN (same with you?).
Mathematically and under the assumption that the tracking parameters were the same on each LP-side Loefgrens Euclidian Approaching would be correct! As either the one nor the other is correct the bases for the calculation is not right - especially not for Stereo!
UNI-DIN was accomplished on the bases of a Stereo-Microgroove LP. The Stereo track, nor 33 1/3 or 45 rpm existed at the time of Loefgren ´s calculation. The same for Baerwald.
When you want enjoying a LP with all tracks you better move to UNI-DIN, also regarding the last songs on the record.
MIchael Fremer knew why he did not prefer one of the curves at Wally´s miscalculation. Maybe today Michael would see it in a different light?
Best
E.