Phono Preamp. With transformer or fully active

Which phono stage is this?  

Zesto 1.2 uses Jensen transformers with zobel network in place.

Dover,

This simply means that the Zesto added the network in order to deal with the transformer behavior. That is very different than having a phono with that network at the input and then designing the transformer to work into it. This is an easily solvable chicken or the egg paradox.  My response asking about this was in relation to the quoted exchange below

I do not consider the use of the rather heavy secondary load in addition to a Zobel as a sonically acceptable solution.  

FWIW they *are* designed for that.

I took this to mean that the transformers were designed to work into that specific network which made me question where that network actually exists to require that transformer design to naturally work into it.


You said above:

The reality is that transformers are non linear in both amplitude and more importantly phase. It is the phase anomalies that kill the music - musical timing and natural harmonics are destroyed by phase anomalies.

If the time domain is more important than the amplitude domain then what is the logic of using a network on the secondary that corrects for the amplitude domain at the cost of additional phase shift in the time domain? The link below shows the simulation of a hypothetical transformer with and without a Zobel network to damp ringing at high frequencies.

http://www.intactaudio.com/forum/files/screen_shot_2020_08_02_at_81425_am_139.png

If one choses to use a loading network and likes the sonic results, that is fine. I have always found that sonically, loading is the worst thing you can do to a transformer and using anything more than the absolute minimum required is relying on a band-aid for a preventable injury.

dave

For what it's worth I heard a Zesto vs a NVO phono and the NVO was clearly the superior don't know why there's not much talk about NVO, several yrs ago it was much talked about even on these forums.

If one choses to use a loading network and likes the sonic results, that is fine. I have always found that sonically, loading is the worst thing you can do to a transformer and using anything more than the absolute minimum required is relying on a band-aid for a preventable injury.

I said I could hear a difference altering the zobel network, I did not say I liked the sound. I tend to agree with you on loading - either primary or secondary.

I am in the Jonathan Carr camp where I dont believe loading modern moving coil cartridges impacts the cartridge behaviour. Loading a cartridge impacts the following phono stage behaviour - for example poorly designed solid state phono stages with low overload margins at ultra high frequencies.

In selecting transformers for MC’s in my experience it is better to focus on getting the gain into the optimum position for the ensuing phono stage rather than worry about what load the cartridge sees.

I have still sitting in the cupboard - Altec 4629’s, 4722’s, Jensens, FR’s ( ugh ) and an Ortofon. Have previously heard many others. None of them are neutral, they all have their own idiosyncratic sound.

Even optimising the gain structure, moving coils and step up transformers are like a pot luck dinner - you never know what you are going to get until you try it. And they still have the aforementioned phase anomalies across the audio band.

I heard a Zesto vs a NVO phono and the NVO

Yes I’ve heard both. The Zesto is good value for money, the NVO ( all tube, no transformers ) is very good. My only reservation with the NVO is the use of 20+ tubes in it. If 1 goes noisy what a drama finding it. This would drive me nuts ( and I’m a tube guy ).

@dover if the 22 tubed NVO has too many tubes you should hear the 13 tubed NVO. So very close