An ideal amp maintains the voltage output regardless of speaker impedance, which is synonymous with saying it doubles the wattage as the impedance is cut in half.
This isa good post.
Which is why I always ck the weight ofa amp 1st, this tells me the size/quality of the transformer.
Bigger the better,,up to say 80 lbs,, after that i can't lift the thing and not interested.
Big hefty well built trans is what you want to consider,,I recall Marantz had some respectable power in certain models,, Then came along Rotel, NAD, Nacimichi,, Onkyo,, Onkyo and nac has a few amps with some solid power, Rotel, NAD were so over rated Sherwood , Snasui, Luxman, all so over rated on watts. So many ss amps sound anemic to me, I can lift most **100Watt* amps with 1 hand, completely ridiculous.
In hifi there are 2 types of amps
Real watts and fake watts.
Its how beefy and well constructed are the trans.
btw not only do i hate ss amplification,,I also hate as much low wattage SET amps. . best sounding speakers are all under 90bd, 4 ohm. Driven with real wattage power.
This isa good post.
Which is why I always ck the weight ofa amp 1st, this tells me the size/quality of the transformer.
Bigger the better,,up to say 80 lbs,, after that i can't lift the thing and not interested.
Big hefty well built trans is what you want to consider,,I recall Marantz had some respectable power in certain models,, Then came along Rotel, NAD, Nacimichi,, Onkyo,, Onkyo and nac has a few amps with some solid power, Rotel, NAD were so over rated Sherwood , Snasui, Luxman, all so over rated on watts. So many ss amps sound anemic to me, I can lift most **100Watt* amps with 1 hand, completely ridiculous.
In hifi there are 2 types of amps
Real watts and fake watts.
Its how beefy and well constructed are the trans.
btw not only do i hate ss amplification,,I also hate as much low wattage SET amps. . best sounding speakers are all under 90bd, 4 ohm. Driven with real wattage power.