something is not right here and it's on purpose!!!


lf you have the same source master on remastered digital and 1st press vinyl with the same volume, the digital sounds louder and more distorted with more intensity + is there anyway to remove that intensity from remastered digital because it sound like the audio has been run through a distortion pedal? How could legendary producers and mixers not hear this crap?
guitarsam
My only question at this point is how do I adjust MY frequencies?

I mean is it a belly rub with one hand, and a pat on the head with the other to tune it in?

OR a nipple twist, and a left cheek sneek! A nose rub and a head scratch?

I mean is there a tune up manual for proper tuning.

I've done the ol palm slap to the forehead, and stuff became a lot clearer, normally followed by the words, Geez, maneez, listen to that!

I'm new to the whole earth vib thing.  I'm not stressin' though, I'm a slow learner, you know old dog, new trick thing... This ol dog might just stay under the porch for this one though... I think a good lower extremity cleaning is in order. :-)

Regards
I would say that 90% of the preceding comments are off base. I worked  in Nashville and NYC recording studios for seven years. No qualified engineer or producer intentionally or neglectfully makes distorted or poor recordings, unless it's for the art form such as mid-fi, low-fi production etc. Producers and engineers are only a portion of the process, when it comes to the actual final stages of "manufacturing and quality" they are 99% of the time not involved. By the way, record companies for the most part, do not care about the quality of a recording only that the product sells. 
  If you spend some time investigating the manufacturing process you will find that a lot of things can go wrong once the cd plant (or record pressing plant) gets the mastered music. For example, JVC proves my point with their XRCD products. JVC went to great lengths to insure that the manufacturing process was inspected for quality through many stages. Here is a link to a brief overview of the process, https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/jvcs-extended-resolution-compact-disc-xrcd-tas-203-2/
  I personally prefer vinyl to digital however there are some very good sounding CDs. I find that vinyl is more "emotionally involving" than digital playback. The one thing that CDs do better than vinyl is nothing and by that I mean silence. I love quiet vinyl but it's more rare than a quiet CD!
  To  my knowledge there is no "measurement for the emotional qualities elicited by  playback formats. I enjoy vinyl done correctly.
  The insistence from many audiophiles that digital just can't sound good or is inferior to analog at the professional studio level is nonsense. I can absolutely guarantee you that well recorded analog music sounds different but not better than well recorded digital music.
  Ultimately, I prefer well done vinyl pressings of albums over digital (not including some Hi-Res formats such as  DSD etc.) A poorly engineered, mastered or finalized version of music cannot be corrected by the playback format.  What makes a truly great recording is NOT the equipment but the engineer.
A Sony 3324 digital tape machine sounds absolutely wonderful and it should when they originally sold for a few hundred thousand dollars. 
The newer digital studio formats sound great, but you cannot compare CD's with pro digital formats. I do love some of the older recordings from the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80's that are analog. But I also love some of the digital recordings of the last few decades. The devil is in the details.
Sam here and i don't have a problem with digital audio as a media format.almost all digital albums released in the last 10 years are unlistenable and it makes no difference who is responsible? it's a proven fact the record companies have an agenda to destroy the music and thats what we get?
People can't agree on a given format, a way, a type of media, tape, Vinyl, CD, Hard drive, memory drives, everything under the sun.

BUT you (SAM) assert that they are all in concert to destroy ALL music reproduction.  They (every company) got together and agreed on this, to destroy all future music and the way it was produced.  Think on that one SAM Here.  Unlistenable, music from folks that produce music for a living, to make $$$$$.

Sam it makes NO sense. The louder you preach the more it sounds like your needing a little counseling and a med adjustment. From out here in in MY world, I don't RIP music. I can, but no need for me.

Why are you doing it? Ripping music. Is there a reason?

REALLY why are you making copies that you already have an archive of.

If what you have is not a good reproduction, do you really think you can make it better by re recording it in a different way from the same (supposed) flawed source? Humpty Dumpty comes to mind....

According to your thinking, YOU can make chicken soup out of chicken SH&T.   

Regards
Sam,
I’m having a hard time deciding whether everything you post is a put on,
or if you’re serious about it all.
Shark Tank, wadded up paper in lamp sockets, fake pandemic, music industry out to destroy music....
Yep, it’s a put on....