Mr.
ieales
You are so wrong!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping_factor
DF is per definition: "Only the resistive part of the loudspeaker impedance is used. The amplifier output impedance is also assumed to be totally resistive".
You want to go into L & C?
Go.
I'll stick to the rules.
As so, R/R = pure number (DF) it reflects a ratio.
More than that, if you go deep, you will find out that by looking into the Amp's output, through the Speaker cables, the loudspeaker is irrelevant.
The cables do not care what loudspeaker impedance they drives (Z).
You really think that all cable makers do Bode plots B4 releasing a new cable?
All the sudden, you take a subject ( Speaker cables ) and try to test it, or calculate it, in ways no maker ever did? Good luck with that. Bring it in if you did.
By understanding the way it works, you can skip it. Trust me on that.
I've told you already what matters: DF and length, to calculate the #AWG.
It works 100% of the time.
You are so wrong!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damping_factor
DF is per definition: "Only the resistive part of the loudspeaker impedance is used. The amplifier output impedance is also assumed to be totally resistive".
You want to go into L & C?
Go.
I'll stick to the rules.
As so, R/R = pure number (DF) it reflects a ratio.
More than that, if you go deep, you will find out that by looking into the Amp's output, through the Speaker cables, the loudspeaker is irrelevant.
The cables do not care what loudspeaker impedance they drives (Z).
You really think that all cable makers do Bode plots B4 releasing a new cable?
All the sudden, you take a subject ( Speaker cables ) and try to test it, or calculate it, in ways no maker ever did? Good luck with that. Bring it in if you did.
By understanding the way it works, you can skip it. Trust me on that.
I've told you already what matters: DF and length, to calculate the #AWG.
It works 100% of the time.