Why high-end cable manufacturers don't post measurements?


I'd like to get your take on why high-end manufacturers don't post measurements? would you like to see how a cable measure before ....does it matter to you?
scar972
Mr. ieales

You claim that the Audio industry and Audio Testing (Audio Precision) as well as Wikipedia, are all Rubbish.
You know better?

For the sake of this endless argument, what is your explanation to the difference in sound with different speaker cables?
Do you have one?

It is easy to criticize. But what is your theory? What do you have to bring to this discussion table?
Except that you disagree with the entire Audio Industry, testein and  Wikipedia ?



For the sake of this endless argument, what is your explanation to the difference in sound with different speaker cables?
Do you have one?
http://www.ielogical.com/Audio/CableSnakeOil.php

For the sake of this endless argument, what is your explanation to the difference in sound with different speaker cables



For example Take a stranded copper cable of 0awg and one of 12awg running 10 feet connected to any amp with a DF >300 and a nominal 8 Ohm speaker and there is no difference in sound. 
For the sake of this endless argument, what is your explanation to the difference in sound with different speaker cables?
Do you have one?
http://www.ielogical.com/Audio/CableSnakeOil.php
I read it (skimmed some) but Overall, I agree. At least in the attempt and direction.

The big however, in the equation of attempting to be the public protector, is that..in the given complex equation..x, y, and z will forever remain unknowns, as long as humans exist in the realm of possessing differential, or possessing individuality. The self appointed job would be eternal, and unending.

If there was exactly one DUT in all of eternity then all of it could be cut into stone and marked for the ages.

Alas...
the number, the sheer number of possible equipment differences, vs the number of possible human differences, vs the number of possible combinations of such... makes for an equation that has possible differences in each individual case, that probably exceeds the suspected number of atoms in the known universe.

So, without the humanities involved, the engineering end of the pool, simply cannot achieve balance in any way...and finds itself floundering in a unsolvable morass of all.
Mr. teo_audio

Unfortunately, the article you linked to, is a lot of none relevant BS.
I lost it when I came across the "burn in". The only explanation for that with a copper cable is that it doesn’t sound good, and the salesman try to postpone the return, by convincing with the longer listening, the cable will brake in and sound better. I don’t know of how many that helped, but lately it is no more a hit among Audiophiles. They got a wake up call from their common sense. A genuine miracle. 
The article gives no definite answer what cable I (or you or anybody else) need. So you sent me read a long article with a dead end. That was the case when I started reading. What a waste of time.

There is a methode, but it won’t be cut into stone, as all cable makers will oppose it, to protect their markets, manufacturing methods and sales buzzwords. It won’t happen. Some of their representatives are those who are my strong opposers. 

As I claim, there is a methode. Not everybody need to like the results. From what I’d learn, most do ! (9 out of 10).
They about to approve the COVID-19 vaccine, for less success (6/10).
I hope for the health of all, that we get a better than that result from tests.
Regarding my methode and speaker cables, 9 out of 10 is good enough for me. No one will die from the 1q10 that won't like my way.