Evolving from a avr to an av processor. Benefit?

Actually sorry to burst anyone's bubble but the best for the money home theater has been done, and its awesome. https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/8367

AVR or processor? The verdict is in: Neither.

OK MC, I gotta say, if your gonna keep tootin' the same horn you're gonna wear it out. You're gonna get carpal tunnel syndrome, at the least.
Swap tootin' hands, maybe it'll sound different. 

As for the best, come on now...It couldn't get any better if it already is?
So which is it, already the best or is there room for "getting better"?
Just askin'

I know it's lonely at the top, (God knows) but trust me you're not  ALL alone.  Let me move this 400 lb bohemi (that a female Bohemyth) into the launch position. I'm gonna turn it up down here in the Bay area.
Only one speaker because it knocks to many trees down on the way up.

Tell me how does "Girls just want to have fun" sounds" in Seattle.
So there, hows that for tootin'. That a definite HONK! ay?

I can turn it WAY UP up if you like.. Go for Anchorage. :-)

I feel a little James Brown comin' on. Get on up-a', (yea) Get on up now-a'  I'm a.............................................

Regards

The best AVP known to man at this time is from a French company named Trinnov. The Altitude 19 or Altitude 32 has no competition. Starts at 9k. Take your pick. 

Of course an upgrade to an av processor will be used for both ht and stereo.  An avp would join a b&w 803 d3, and b&w center htm2 d3 as fueled by a mc255 amp.  
So how much happier will this component family be if an avp joined the family (eg.  Arcam with dirac)? Seems an avp without Dirac these days could be problematic. Audyssey from marantz appears to be disappointing and troubling.