2. amps-preamps
  3. 159920-976

What is missing here?

In this months Absolute Sound magazine there is a nice review of an amp that many of us would probably consider based not only on the review but on the topology utilized with the amp. The amp in question is the new Air Tight ATM 300R. This amp utilizes the 300B tube and according to Dick Olsher " The Air tight ATM300-R wowed me with countless hours of listening pleasure. It consistently brought to life the full sonic promise of the 300B". Sounds amazing right??


Except, nowhere ( except in the specs section) does it mention that this amp is limited to 9Watts/Ch!! And at that it is putting out about 10% distortion! So not only is the amp severely limited to which speakers one can match it to, but those speakers had better be ULTRA high efficiency. While most experienced a’philes will expect the extremely severe limitations of this kind of max output, how many casual listeners who read this article will realize the extreme limitations that this amp comes with? Certainly none of that is mentioned in the review, which brings up the question...why not??? How many even somewhat seasoned a’philes have made the mistake of matching a flea powered amp with a less than favorable speaker load? Let’s hear about it....
128x128daveyf
daveyf's avatar
daveyf OP
2,871 posts
 
@daj Perhaps you are trying to read too much into what I am getting at...
aewarren
645 posts
 
No daveyf, it certainly does not concern me that TAS omitted what was obvious to nearly everyone, even yourself. The reviewer also omitted the fact that you have to plug it in for it to work. Maybe if you read the review again with comprehension, you’ll understand why you are getting so much backlash. And no one had to tell me that I shouldn’t buy a VW Bug to pull my travel trailer either.
daveyf's avatar
daveyf OP
2,871 posts
 
@aewarren. Your posts say a lot about you. I certainly hope that you never find yourself in a position of disadvantage because someone failed to disclose something to you..

Maybe then we can talk about comprehension...or lack thereof!
billzame
69 posts
 
I would make a different point about the problem with the review.  I am not in the market for a low power amp or for $15,000 amp of any power.  The knowledge that this is a low power amp that costs $15,000 would very likely inform my decision about whether to read the review ... I shouldn't have to read to the end of a long review to find that out.  To make the point a little more sharply, suppose TAS were to publish a long and detailed amplifier review that ended with the sentence "Unfortunately, only 10 of these amplifiers were manufactured and they were all destroyed when the factory exploded."  Would't you feel sort of cheated that you had read an entire review of a non-existent product? 
[I guess this might be OK on April 1, but not in September.]
daveyf's avatar
daveyf OP
2,871 posts
 
@billzame. Great points. In this particular review, there is actually no mention of the output power of this amp in the body of the piece. So, one could actually read the whole piece and not realize what that is!
More to discover