Audio Aero Prima 24/192 Mk II cd player......

Yes, don't worry and be happy as all of this is fun! The Prima may be perfect sounding to another who likes a different sound. This hobby is all about what you like to hear.

If you try the Prima and like it, then keep it and enjoy. If you find it lacks body, send it back and try another. That simple. Even better, buy it used for the right price and sell if you want to try another. If you buy right you wont lose money and can try another. I love this site just for this reason.

So many have raved about the Prima I had to try it. My experience was not like theirs. I sold it after two months hoping it would "change". Rooms can also impact the sound of a system and front end dramatically. A system that works great in one room will have "issues" in another.

Just try and enjoy like other posters have said. Great to try your two top choices side by side and decide. Sell the loser or send it back as part of a trial!

Bill

This is how I deal with knowing, or suspecting, that there are cdps out there for the same price that may be better. If I'm grooving with mine, it (the Prima in this case) is a keeper. I think I have a ridiculous pair of tympanics as far as being on the picky side. If it works for me, that is all that matters. Sometimes I get, yeah, a bit ridiculously zealous passing the audiophoolish word. Now, believe me, if I get the upgrade itch (anyone know about that?) you can bet that I'll think about replacing my Prima. For now it (my entire system) meets my tympanic needs. Proud of me?-- I didn't mention you know what.... peace, warren

I had AA Prima MKII DAC and replaced it a week ago by Metronome C1A mkIII, the latter being MUCH more musical (in my system)

I can answer my own question above as I recently acquired the AA prima. compared to the stock xa777es the prima's soundstage was only slightly smaller with a sound that was slightly less room filling but big enough that it was still very very enjoyable. the xa777es did have better tonal balance (ie more seamless across the frequencies)but I dont know whether that is only because relative to prima the sony was far more dull with less sparkle and excitement and in that, the whole musical presentation "appears" more seamless. the sony is really good and i like what it can do but my personal tastes edged out and preferred the prima. easily. the sony to me seemed more "brainy" while the prima more "heart" without being tubey. The prima seemed closer to being a "musical instrument" and the sony more closer to being a "machine"
the sony was very resolving but it didnt lift the information to the level of emotion and music as could the prima. This is a bigger fault imo than a slightly smaller soundstage and a little less tonal balance. both machines are "great" and i suppose I could live with either but having "tasted" the prima I like what it does and so it will stay in my system and be enjoyed.

Vertigo: As an owner of a Sony C333ES and Prima Mk2, I have to say I totally agree with all your comments on the comparison of your XA777ES vs. your Prima. In my world, I clearly prefer the Prima's style over the Sony's.