I have recently upgraded my DAC 1.1 to a 2.0. I've enjoyed the 1.1 for several years here in my office system. I must say however that I was VERY pleasantly surprised how much better the 2.0 sounded. The first thing I noticed was a blacker, quieter background. The 2.0 is much less "digital" sounding than the 1.1. Bel Canto told me that virtually everything inside the DAC is removed and replaced with a new design. I've noticed tighter bass, more definition and a much more relaxed, musical presentation. IMHO, there is little comparison between the DACS. I would gladly upgrade again!
Bel Canto DAC2 vs. DAC1/1.1?
I read the 6Moons review of the DAC2, which said the DAC2 sounds like a Wadia.
I also read the Soundstage review that says the DAC2 sound very similar to the DAC1/1.1, except for more extended frequency extremes.
Which review is closer to the truth and which one do others enjoy from a long term listening and musical worth point of view? (would be connected to an RME Digi 96/8 PAD sound card, either via a Stereovox HDXV digital cable or glass toslink cable)
I also read the Soundstage review that says the DAC2 sound very similar to the DAC1/1.1, except for more extended frequency extremes.
Which review is closer to the truth and which one do others enjoy from a long term listening and musical worth point of view? (would be connected to an RME Digi 96/8 PAD sound card, either via a Stereovox HDXV digital cable or glass toslink cable)
- ...
- 5 posts total
- 5 posts total