Beauty is only skin deep? Maybe yes, maybe no....your vote for the best looking...


Most of us are influenced by the cosmetics of anything, especially humans.  I have had great cars that are superb in handling or some aspect of performance...and have had some that were simply great looking.  

I was wondering what, in your audio journey, have been the best looking (in your eyes/mind) components, speakers..etc.?

This, of course is superficial and subjective and not what the high end is about...but the fastest cars I ever drove were race cars and not street cars...and no race car was as good looking as some of the street/sports cars I have owned. 

As far as my audio components, I did like the looks of the CJ-ART, the Martin-Logan Sequel II, and surprisingly some of the Nakamichi SoundSpace models I have had.  In there own way the classic Audio Research look is one I have owned and respect, but are not overly "pretty". (overall the CJ-ART was the most enjoyable to look at as I listened to great music)

Since this is subjective, there is no "wrong" reply and we should respect everyone's opinion.........even if they are seriously mistaken!

I should add that performance affects my judgement....the Dahlquist DQ-10 is not a beauty winner, but they were so darned good....that they started to look good to me.

Thanks



whatjd
Interesting question. The world of audio is hardly flowing over with great looking products, but I think it is possible to have both looks and performance.

The Roksan Xerxes 20 plus is a fabulous looking turntable. My preferred finish would be one in gloss white. Even the cut out platter mat is an embellishment on what is already a very elegant design.

The Leben cs300/600 amplifiers look endearingly old-worlde with their gold fascias and wooden side panels. If they only sound as half as good as they look...

As for loudspeakers, even though the traditional box is unlikely to be the optimum shape for the cabinet, I find that all the classic BBC based designs (Harbeth, Spendor etc) reassuringly look like what I expect loudspeakers to look like.

Especially in their lighter finishes such as cherry or maple finishes.

I also thought the innovative 3 box Naim SBLs (in a lighter finish of course) were great looking loudspeakers, as were virtually all of the Martin Logan range too.

Of course plain ugly products abound but my pet hate are designs such as the Linn Majik range with their hideously ’bling’ chrome tweeter assembly.

Whoever designed that range, and more importantly whoever sanctioned it, cannot have much, if any, sense of aesthetics.
cd318,  

Perhaps that is a thought for a different thread, the ugliest high end audio products ever?




 Italian made audio products in general are the most visually appealing to me, whether minimalist or lavish in aesthetics.