How come there is no thread on the RealityCheck?

One needs only to read YOUR posts to make MY point. That is succinctly evident and indisputable by any rationale person. Thank you and very nice try.

Exactly what is meant by those who use "endorsement" in this context? Is it that some people think Tbg (or anyone who is very enthusiastic about something)is making money off the product? If so, I imagine it might help others as well, if this was stated more clearly and explicitly. If the term means something else to others who use it, I would genuinely like to know what is meant.

FWIW, I value the differences of opinion that I read here. When posts are nasty and sarcastic I find them less credible.

Tbg claims this product is "one (of) the greatest improvements in audio in 40 years". He's being disingenuous to think an over the top claims such as that won't be met with skepticism.

Does anybody know if this process works on computer files (WAV or AIFF) or does it only work on a physical CD?

Onhwy61, I do believe this, but I did add that it was my opinion.

It only works in copying a cd to a cd. VRS reports that they heard a clear difference between the original and RC copy I sent when playing them on a player. When they were both put on a hard drive, however, they heard no difference. I find this curious, but really do not fully understand why what is on a hard drive differs from what a player reads.

I guess if you were to burn a cd from a WAV and then reburn it on the RC, you might hear an improvement.

Onhwy61 makes a great point. If you're going to throw out the fact that this escalates RB to LP or SACD quality or better. Then it's going to be a little hard to beleive. The review of it even mentioned that it brings out more tape noise, etc.

It's a very bold claim. Now it has to live up to it, and I'm not convinced at this point. We'll see when the dust settles.