How come there is no thread on the RealityCheck?

Tvad - I think I understand, and I certainly respect what you had to say in your post beginning "Gentlemen and ladies..." I do not see the posts as "attacks" per se, which is why I did not use that word. Nor do I "...support that which cannot, or will not, be verified". I take no position on the RC business, as I would need to hear both the RC and the cheaper duplicator results for myself, no matter what George Louis says. I agree wholeheartedly with you with regard to the value of questions and discussion. I just don't know how anyone could answer the very reasonable question "...if there is another burner containing identical Plextor drives that produces the same changes." That is, without listening to both. So far, to my knowledge, George Louis is (presumably) the only one who has done that.

I do see SOME of the posts on Audiogon to be primarily about denigrating individuals, sometimes thinly veiled, and sometimes not. In some cases, in fact, I see nothing about equipment or music in them at all. Then there are those individuals who clearly now have a pattern of being almost always negative, and/or "baiting" other people (please understand I am not talking about you! :) It appears that a couple of the recent posts which moved me to ask the question I did of the board (and were examples of what I am speaking of) have been removed, so I cannot refer you to them to read. What I said yesterday to the board had absolutely nothing at all to do with George Louis and his responsibilities.

Sksos, I for one will be very interested in what you find, but also concerned about your prior notions.

One of his friends and I are in much contact, and he says that George has many, many various hard drives with many mods lying around as well as many cleaning solutions. This might well suggest, as this guy thinks, that George has invested much R&D.

Norm, I'm not saying he hasn’t invested the time and research to find the best drives possible. I am saying that the drives are "standard" drives with NO modifications.
When we do the comparison, it will be with at least 2 other audiophiles, one will be a reviewer, will give an honest assessment. If George’s sound better, so be it. I have no vested interest who’s sounds better.

Sksos- my experience with telephone calls and emails with George are similar to yours.

I really appreciate Norm's bring this product/issue to the forum, and thanks to folks who provided info about the hardware, CDR, etc.

If you read my posts, I saw the potential to improve the burning process with psu and other audiophile upgrades.

We can wax on about what George does or doesn't do to the stand alone burner he sells, but I think everyone can agree CD duplicators and cleaning /disc treatments have the potential to improve the sonic performance of some CDs. Like many, many other CDs tweaks, YMMV.

Steve's posting on AudioAsylum about the competitor duplicator, Cool Copy, was wrongfully removed in my opinion as he does not sell this unit.

In essence he found the Cool Copy superior to the RealityCheck. George Louis does not agree. I have ordered a Cool Copy to try myself.

This all is one of the most muddled and troubling discussions I have ever experienced. All that I know with any certainty is that cleaning and copying cds can greatly improve their sound, and I emphasize "can" as results vary.