I'm just tired of arguing, especially most of people don't follow the subject. I also don't understand some of your statements. Capacitor is charged only from the bottom of the ripple to next peak. Bigger ripple means longer charging time - ALWAYS!, but you disagree with this.
Ripple is a function of capacitance and load current. At constant load current when capacitors get larger (big capacitance) voltage ripple gets smaller hence current charges will be narrower (and usually of higher amplitude because of lower ESR). Yes, additional impedance will make charging pulses smaller, because they depend on source voltage divided by impedance in the charging circuit - but charging time will not get longer! It will be charged exactly the same amount of time - from the bottom of the ripple to next peak. Additional impedance in the charging circuit will only result in the voltage drop and the lower voltage on capacitors. It does not affect charging time within each cycle.
Yes, Furman's output capacitor appears to be connected in parallel to electrolytic caps, but is not. It is on the the other side of the rectifier on the AC side. Voltage on this capacitor follows AC voltage cycle but any loss of charge caused by PS charging pulse is replenished from energy stored in the inductor thru the whole cycle. In addition this (huge!) capacitor has very low ESR. That way during narrow charging pulses current comes from this capacitor and not from the inductor. Removing this capacitor would have huge effect on the amp. Just connect big inductor in series with mains and you will see results. There are power supplies that charge/discharge capacitors during whole cycle because they have big choke in series but then capacitors' voltage is an average and not the peak of the waveform.
Perhaps we're hijacking this thread?
Ripple is a function of capacitance and load current. At constant load current when capacitors get larger (big capacitance) voltage ripple gets smaller hence current charges will be narrower (and usually of higher amplitude because of lower ESR). Yes, additional impedance will make charging pulses smaller, because they depend on source voltage divided by impedance in the charging circuit - but charging time will not get longer! It will be charged exactly the same amount of time - from the bottom of the ripple to next peak. Additional impedance in the charging circuit will only result in the voltage drop and the lower voltage on capacitors. It does not affect charging time within each cycle.
Yes, Furman's output capacitor appears to be connected in parallel to electrolytic caps, but is not. It is on the the other side of the rectifier on the AC side. Voltage on this capacitor follows AC voltage cycle but any loss of charge caused by PS charging pulse is replenished from energy stored in the inductor thru the whole cycle. In addition this (huge!) capacitor has very low ESR. That way during narrow charging pulses current comes from this capacitor and not from the inductor. Removing this capacitor would have huge effect on the amp. Just connect big inductor in series with mains and you will see results. There are power supplies that charge/discharge capacitors during whole cycle because they have big choke in series but then capacitors' voltage is an average and not the peak of the waveform.
Perhaps we're hijacking this thread?