CD Redbook versus DVD Audio


Being an 'insider' in the industry keeps one busy enough not to read some of the(even though basic) information, which one should read.
Recently a friend brought over the Chris Botti album, recorded on both sides--one CD the other DVD Audio.
Well, after extolling the virtues of CD Redbook, in recent years, with the newer players, I would have to admit freely that (even though I own the Exemplar DVD which plays, I think, all platforms available including DVD Audio) I had never 'gone over to the dark side.'
Good Lord, this is better in virtually every way possible.
What struck me (about this limited experience)was the way that the staging improved,with blackness within the soundstage, taking it to an almost holgraphic experience--- with BASS just rolling, very naturally, out of the speakers like never before!!
This bordered, to me, on the same level of experience that I had when I first discovered Tubes,(not the Bass, but Staging part) at the dawn of civilization. Really, it was that kind of 'new found experince' and yes,was that good.
The bass took on an almost surreal quality, with tonality I had not experienced, except with the great tonearms, and Koetsu cartridgess, from waaaay back in the days of those round black things....the one's that have ticks and pops but sound great if done correctly.
This is as close as I have been to that kind of, and level of, both musical experience and what I perceive to be, accuracy of sound.
Anybody else out there with similar kind of experience with DVD Audio? I know, given the breadth of 'terrible recordings' that some must sound horrible, as usual, but when done close to right, wow.
If more are good than bad, and assuming that when done correctly that it excels, which it may not, given this caveat--why is this platform not more popular?. I know the arguments about too many choices, and too few audiophiles, but this is 'remarkably better' in my limited, and more important, IMHO.
Larry
lrsky
Post removed 
Just tonight I went back and listened to the Chris Botti, and then to several other regular discs that I have enjoyed many times in the past--and franky felt were mong the top quality recordings I own. I realized that the DVD was better in every way, and offered all the advantages listed in the orignial post, but it was even more so than I had originally stated!!
Sometimes I can overstate differences that I hear. (An admission that all audiophiles should consider making.) Frankly, on the second, and even more lengthy comparison, I was surprised at how completely 'flat'the cds (that I had previously revered) sounded. The dynamic contrasting was almost completely 'squashed' sounding. The staging collapsed forward and lacked the holographic sense that I had noticed on the Botti recording. It really was strange to her them after this eye opening, rather ear opening session. (In the back of my mind I am thinking that this is going to cost me another fortune to replace my discs for the umpteenth time; I mean really, how many times am I going to replace the same music? Thank God I didn't fall for El Cassette or 8 Track!!!)
This immediately got me to the internet to look for as many titles as I could find, and I found a web site which has tons of DVDAs listed. If you guys like I will post their name so you can take a look at their offerings.
My only issue with this particular site is, even though I had narrowed my 'search' to DVD Audio, they show others (meaning non DVDA,s) in that same location, so I had to go back and forth several times and eliminate some regular cds from my cart.
Let me know if you'd like the name of this site--its good with that one caveat, and offers a wide variety of music, for virtually all tastes.
Larry
Tvad...If it's too much trouble for you, then it's too much trouble for you. For me...no problem. Compared with the ritual that playing vinyl requires, it's nothing.
Post removed 
I had a similar experience when comparing the redbook cd version of Alan Parson's "I Robot" to the 24/96 DVD version issued by the Classic Records label a few years back.

This disc is not a true DVD-A, but the "tweener" 24/96 stereo format that will play on any standard DVD video player. I vote it as the most "underappreciated digital format/most short-lived" award. It was just getting off the ground when the big buzz surrounding the DVD-A multichannel disc format was heating up in 2000 and killed it off.

The Classic Records disc has a much more pleasant overall sound compared to the CD. The opening track is holographic sounding and you can easily hear the individual voices which make up the choir section as they harmonize. There are also some synthesizer and triangle or bell strikes that just hang in the air like they are real. It sounds awesome.

The kicker is that my cd player is no slouch. I have an Arcam FMJ cd-23 with the Ring-Dac, but my old Sony DVD carousel player from 1998 can handle 24/96 stereo without downconverting and output it via it's analog outputs. And I'll be damned but that 24/96 disc sounds better on the Sony vs. the redbook cd played on my Arcam!

I never understood why that format all but disappeared. In stereo, at least, I think you'd be hard pressed to really hear a huge improvement in sound going upmarket to SACD or DVD-A...and you don't even have to buy a new DVD player! JZ