2. digital
  3. 1132068751

Anyone have experience with the Nanotec Nespa?

I'd be interested in your experience, including whether you have compared it with the Reality Check, used it in conjunction with the R Check, with fluids, etc. Thanks

for those not familiar: http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/nanotech/nespa.html
jfz
puremusic
226 posts
 
Norm (Tbg),

WOW, a score of 5 as compared to 1, 1.5 or 2. That is attention getting.Thanks for the info. Great work! The one thing that is consistent in your experiment as well as Leec's and Sksos' experiments is that Nespaing an RC cd-r is beneficial. Leec's results suggest that Nespaing a cd-r before duplication is detrimental. While Sksos Nespad the original CD before duplicating it, he did not give us a comparison between an RC copy of a Nespad CD and a Nespad RC copy of a Nespad CD. Your tonight's experiment should provide this missing piece. Please let us know your outcome.

Best Regards,
John
puremusic
226 posts
 
Sksos and Leec,

Have either of you compared the sonic improvements made by Intron #8500 Protect and the Reality Check's cleaning fluids PRIOR to duplication. Also, what is the sonic comparison between the DUPLICATES that were made using these two cleaners.

Best Regards,
John
sksos
162 posts
 
I can say that the cleaning of the original disc with either cleaner is essential to get the best sound. Also cleaning a blank BLACK CDR before duplicating is also a MUST to get the best possible sound. To not clean a blacn black CDR before copying is a no no. So first clean your original, and the blank CDR, Nespa the original, make the duplication, then Nespa the copy. A simple but well worth process for FULL enjoyment.
tbg
5,263 posts
 
Steve, I, of course, have not tried the 8500, but I cannot agree with you about the benefits of Nespaing the original and the copy.

I actually preferred just Nespaing the RC copy. Nespaing the copy of the Nespaed original did not change my opinion. I am greatly relieved about not having to redo the 60 cds I have already made. All I have to do is Nespa them.

I also did CoolCopy versions of the Nespaed originals but have not yet listened to them.

Basically the Nespaing of the RC copies greatly enhances the realism of the sound stage and gives bass more impact. I can fell the change in my listen chairs vibration.

In passing I treated an sacd that already was improved by Nespaing for 60. I redid it as others have recommended for an additional 120 (I don't know what the unit is here, but I think it is seconds). This greatly improved the one sacd that I treated.

I really have no idea given what I have read about how the Nespa works why it has any effect on a cd-r with no metal layer. Have you asked Nespa about this?
sksos
162 posts
 
Norm,
It's fine we don't agree on everything, we all hear different things and we all have different priorities what we listen for. There are several people who feel the RC duplicator is better than the Cool Copy but there MANY more who feel the CC is MUCH better than the RC, no matter, everyone agrees that duplicating is a big benefit.
As for Nesaping an original disc 1st, or just Nespaing the copy, I still hear an improvement doing both. Again, in my system, this always sounds better.
As for why the Nespa can make a CDR sound better, no, I've not asked Japan. Their is a big communication gap on most question I have asked, since I don't speak Japanese and no one at Nanotec speaks English. All I know is I've heard from over 100 customers that ALL agree, there is a positive improvement on ALL formats. Many customers report huge improvements on video discs, a cleaner picture, brighter colors....I've yet to try this since I don't watch any TV.
Keep the reports coming in, love to hear your further experiments.
Steve
More to discover