Anyone listen to Zu Audio's Definition Mk3?


Comparisons with the 1.5s and the others that came before? Getting the itch; again......
128x128warrenh
So glad the buzz on the Def 4s is uniformly positive. As I've said on this thread before, I've purchased sound unheard based purely on my experience of the 2s over the last few years.
A recent tt purchase has been really positive but aspects of it's spound have challenged poss lack of transparency in the 2s. I'm hoping the improved nano FRDs in the 4s are going to improve this side of audio reproduction.
Glory, i WAS in on the joke. However since so many in the audiophile community change their equipment as fast as they change their underwear, there may have been some truth in your statement.
Great to hear that you (and 213cobra/Gsm18439) believe these speakers are up there with those in the upper level of performers. Although, with the frankly ludicrous prices being charged for the state of the art in loudspeakers, thank God for Zu Audio and their real world approach to performance/price ratio.
Although, with the frankly ludicrous prices being charged for the state of the art in loudspeakers, thank God for Zu Audio and their real world approach to performance/price ratio.

Well put Spirit. The Zu boys are a great group of guys that support their work like no other.
I can really second that, Glory. Contact by email with esp. Sean, but also Gerritt, always elicits helpful prompt replies. Even in these days of having to work for people's hard earned $s, such great relations really encourages positivity in sticking with this company. Sean esp. seems a really happy fellow, and I get nothing but excellent vibes in dealing with Zu.
After all my trials and tribulations with amps, I've settled on Quads II 40s. They have an excellent balance of dynamics, air, and tone.

They are also the most inexpensive pair of amps I've had in my system. Go figure.