Perfect Path "Solutions" (PPS) eMat


Does anyone know the intricate details of how these most current PPS eMats differ, aside by appearance, from the previous two generations of PPT eMat & eMat+?.any insight will be greatly appreciated...

Thanx! Mooncrikit
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xmooncrikit
mooncrikit,

For a person starting a thread with a question, you appear hostile to people not answering the question with what seem to be your preconceived answers. Why don’t you simply post an answer? You seem to know it anyway. Use deduction. You already know what is wrong so whatever will be left will be right.

So far, your contribution to this thread, apart from starting it, has been less than zero. You contributed only negativity.

If you do not like answers and explanations people give you, by all means, move to another thread and stop spreading your vigilant negativity here.
"Frank and I are two of a very select small group who actually knows what they’re talking about."
"The man who thinks he has all the answers has after all no reason to go looking.

That’s our empty suit."

glupson definitely wins for the best comedy, though, realistically, MC provides an endless source of material.

MC, you work in a hospital and you don't even know how masks work.   I hate to tell you this MC, but the physics of electricity and sound don't change between a recording studio, a mixing studio, and a home.


antigrunge2, I didn't diss the product by the way. I actually gave it the benefit of the doubt that it actually did something, probably even along the lines of some of the claims.  Absent evidence (and I still don't see MC or Papa providing any), I have no reason to believe PP had the wherewithal to develop, test, or manufacture such a product from "scratch" i.e. roll extrude or mold an EMI mat.  Absent such capabilities but giving them the benefit of the doubt it somewhat does what it says, a logical conclusion is they sourced and branded it. I have no issue with that. If people can do it with fuses, why not EMI mats?
Copy of my post from elsewhere today...

"I have a minor observation for this and one more thread.

Skeptic is spelled with K, not with C. It is not an important detail, but may as well be the only useful knowledge gained here."
"I have a minor observation for this and one more thread.

Skeptic is spelled with K, not with C. It is not an important detail, but may as well be the only useful knowledge gained here."

I stand corrected. Apparently, sKeptic is in North America and sCeptic more or less everywhere else.

Well, that is also some knowledge gained here.