my thoughts are that digital gets let down through the transfer stages of becoming a CD/SACD,etc.
It (digital) has probably a more accurate reproduction of a master tape than a vinyl master/pressing.
Why? As I record my LP's in a DSD format for convenience and availability, I find it hard to discern between the LP and the digital playback of it in DSD.(Korg DSD recorder). As I get into PCM, the quality starts to lessen and differentiations start appearing. Probably also less data space is required as we go down from DSD to 16/44.1. In easier terms I would say 45rpm presings better than 33rpm, etc.
So digital can convey the soul, but I feel during the transfer chain we are not getting the best out of it and it starts to loose out.
Hence we have all these formats such as High res downloads, SACD, Reel to Reel, XRCD,K2HD,etc.
Redbook certainly does not have enough space for the amount of music record companies want to put on it.
Record companies are also tactful for the fact that if they eventually do let out a quality so close to the master tape -then the game's over for them- as they will never be able to sell another version of a 're-mastered' 'higher ultimate quality' ,etc. again. After all how often have the Beatles, Sonny Rollins, Miles Davis, Rolling Stones have been re-released and we know we haven't seen the last of it or a special edition.
So my final view is that vinyl and digital both have different presentations and if you can get lost into either of them more easily, you will feel the soul. Easier on vinyl though.
Cheers,
Neville