New KEF Reference 5 speakers


After many months of auditioning speakers (and probably testing the patience of several salesmen) I finally decided to get the KEF Reference 5s.  I just loved the wide sound stage and almost holographic imaging, among other things.  They were delivered in February and I’ve spent many hours listening.  At first I was disappointed.  They just didn’t produce the same imaging at my house with my equipment as in the store.  Also, they sounded bright and harsh with violins and high end music.  The dealer came to my house along with the regional sales rep from KEF to provide advice.  They urged me to allow more break in time (at that point they had been played about 100 hours). After many more hours, I am becoming more acquainted with them.  They are still improving with time.  Them break in period seems to be very lon. They’ve played several hundred hours and are still improving. They are extremely source sensitive—meaning that a poorly engineered record or CD will sound terrible and a well recorded one can be great.  I suppose this is a good thing with the KEFS-that they reveal flaws so well says something about their accuracy. Unfortunately there seem to be more bad recordings than good ones so I’m finding many of my CDs and records very difficult to listen to.  I am still experimenting with speaker placement, learning which recordings are really good and which aren’t and other tweaks.  Not totally convinced it’s love but we are at least in like and the relationship is moving in a positive direction. I’ve delayed posting anything until now because I didn’t want to share any premature conclusions.  
fast
Ben-this is Fast.  Good to hear from you. Glad you stuck with the Ref 5s and are now enjoying them. As I’ve said before, they do require patience when brand new but that patience is rewarded within a few months. Sounds like you’ve made some good improvements.  
As for my system, I’ve added Isoacoustics Gaia footers. I also had a professional (Sterling Trayle) spend a day positioning my speakers and had a dedicated 20 amp line installed...the latter two things a little over a year ago, just before Covid. I’ve upgraded some usb cables to Wireworld and some power cords to Audioquest Y3. As I may have mentioned, I added a Rega RP6 turntable with Dynavector cartridge (I don’t listen to records very much so I wanted something mid priced but good). Finally, I tried connecting my PS Audio Directstream DAC directly to my Krell power amp and liked it. I went looking for a preamp which would be similar to a direct connection but allow me to use my phono, tuner, etc. and arrived at the Benchmark LA4.  I I ordered an LA4 from Music Direct, which allows a 60 day trial.  I kept it. I think it’s about the closest you can get to a direct connection with multiple inputs. As a bonus, it’s very reasonably priced for such a preamp.  
So how does it all sound?  I’m happy and done fiddling, at least for a while. In terms of biggest difference, I’d have to say the preamp and the speaker positioning. I’m still not totally convinced that ultra expensive cables make that big a difference compared to good moderately priced ones (or maybe my hearing isn’t acute enough to appreciate it). The Gaias are a step up over the standard spikes but not a huge one, especially considering the cost. Most of all, I’m enjoying the Ref 5s and...happy I chose them over the many other speakers I considered and, like you, that I stuck with them. 
For what it's worth, I switched from an older KEF reference to an equivalent ATC, and I was much happier. They're along the same lines in terms of sound signature, but the ATCs just did everything better.
In your shoes, I probably would hang on to what I've got, but there you go.
Heard ATC speakers. Couldn’t hold a candle to KEF Reference 5. Absolutely no comparison.  Some day you may want to upgrade. But thanks for your input.  
Hi Fast!

Indeed you are fast in replying! Thanks for your replying! Glad that you are enjoying your system! Would be nice to post a youtube/sound demo to see what kind of sound you are enjoying!  :)

Haha totally agree with you that speaker positioning makes a world of difference! Haha have yet to try a dedicated pre-amp in view of budget constraints but I will remember your opinion if I am shopping for seperates in future! I remember one of the audio shop owners on "thomas and stereo" said the same as you too -- that pre-amp makes the biggest difference in a system. 

Haha for now I think I will still be looking for a more tube system until one day i feel that power is my thing I'm chasing. Haha have always been lusting after the 845/211/300B amps and always thinking if those 20-30W class A amps will be sufficient to drive the ref 5s! haha if I do make the jump will update more in here! for now I'm really loving the "colour" of the sound that the speakers/tubes are producing -- they sound so "correct" and indescribable. may be due to 3rd order harmonics but am willing to sacrifice big power for the correct "colour" :)

Please do update further when you have further upgrades/changes! Happy to hear that you are enjoying system, and stay safe wherever you are!

Regards
Ben
Hi m669326

Agree with Fast. The ATC and Kef ref 5 sounds are very different. Have heard the SCM19, 20, 40 before. Not sure if it was due to the speakers or front end or cabling -- I felt they were too bright for me. But then again I am very sensitive to bright sounds -- might not be a good representative of the population at large. But in terms of detail have to agree its extremely detailed -- if you are chasing for 100% accuracy that may be just the speaker for you :)

Enjoy your ATCs :)