Hi there fellow! :-)
thanks for the advice. Had a look/listen to some of the YouTube clips and i fully agree to his opinion on the strengths and what stands out with the EVO, and also what makes it different from the Wilson for example.
the midrange and the treble is less critical to the rest of the equipment, as also he dresses, it works great with lesser cables and electronics but as you up the range the EVO blossoms. Though i find the bass in the EVO to be more demanding, it has all the goods except the punch and the slam until you have your amp, source and especially clean network and power feed is in place. Before its textured, autothorative, powerful, has weight but not the punch. In my room and in my environment and to my ears of course..
Bottom line, they are awesome and I don’t after a bit more than two years lean elsewere.
will continue follow Jay channel and see more of the clips comparing more speakers, and I’m also curios how he finds the Pass INT 250 as well..
have a great Sunday ahead!
thanks for the advice. Had a look/listen to some of the YouTube clips and i fully agree to his opinion on the strengths and what stands out with the EVO, and also what makes it different from the Wilson for example.
the midrange and the treble is less critical to the rest of the equipment, as also he dresses, it works great with lesser cables and electronics but as you up the range the EVO blossoms. Though i find the bass in the EVO to be more demanding, it has all the goods except the punch and the slam until you have your amp, source and especially clean network and power feed is in place. Before its textured, autothorative, powerful, has weight but not the punch. In my room and in my environment and to my ears of course..
Bottom line, they are awesome and I don’t after a bit more than two years lean elsewere.
will continue follow Jay channel and see more of the clips comparing more speakers, and I’m also curios how he finds the Pass INT 250 as well..
have a great Sunday ahead!