I understand the measurements implicitly, it‘s just that one‘s own philosophy as to how far certain measurements correlate with subjective listening results will normally determine how ’full (or empty) of it‘one determines the reviewer to be. So this becomes a rather subjective process. Which is fine by me.
You need to understand the measurements also, that way you can form a judgement if the reviewer is full of it or not.
If you don't understand the measurements as well your just p*****g into the wind.
Cheers George
Or do do you believe in absolutes? In which case it is very easy to identify ’full of it’ reviewers (possibly even creating a ’fulness’ score for each reviewer) and by extrapolation disqualify their future reviews from garnering any credibility.