I just wasted some time reading that PS Audio/Max T. link. Attempt at science, for sure, credible statements, surely not.
Where has it been described? Not in the video link provided. At least not a comprehensive method.
How come there is an ongoing debate when there is little doubt? Even "little doubt" is an exaggerated assumption.
If anything, it describes oscilloscope readings and not audible differences.
Says who? Based on what? In whole test, nobody listened to anything.
It goes on and on with some marketing quasi-scientific mumbo-jumbo. It would not be accepted at the middle-school science fair.
Any deviation from “flat” should be measurable and will most likely be audible as a tonal change in the audio signal.No, most likely not. Do not assume.
"The experimental method has been described in detail, to enable researchers to repeat the tests in order to verify the conclusions."
Where has it been described? Not in the video link provided. At least not a comprehensive method.
"There is little doubt that speaker cables affect the sound of audio systems. Audiophiles have known this since the 1970s and there has been an ongoing debate ever since."
How come there is an ongoing debate when there is little doubt? Even "little doubt" is an exaggerated assumption.
"This analysis clearly describes the cause of audible differences between a range of cables, and the examples included demonstrate this effect."
If anything, it describes oscilloscope readings and not audible differences.
"This is analogous to the chaos in speaker cables where there is a mismatch between the cable and the speaker. This chaos is the main reason for the all-so-common brightness and hardness heard in audio systems."
Says who? Based on what? In whole test, nobody listened to anything.
It goes on and on with some marketing quasi-scientific mumbo-jumbo. It would not be accepted at the middle-school science fair.