Sound quality of Newer versus Older speakers


From a sound quality perspective, is there anything that newer speakers are doing better than older speakers. For reference, I have a pair of Monitor Audio Silver 300s which are amazing me with their ability to balance detail retrieval with an ability to avoid harshness (with the right ancillaries). My subjective perception is that this type of balance between resolution and refinement was more difficult to find in speakers from 20-30 years ago.
calvinandhobbes
I have Vandersteen 1Bs, about 25 years old.  I took them to Miller Sound assuming they should be re furbished but was told they were fine. Mr. Miller stated that as long as speakers have not been exposed to dampness, or other harsh conditions, they'll last a very long time. I think he was right. They do sound great.  
Hi @tennisdoc56 

Cheap watts leaded us to wrong direction - low sensitive speakers.
low sensitive = compression!
You can do nothing with low of physics. Hight power heats voice coil and cause thermal distortion including compression.
You can use nuclear plant power for amplification it wouldn't fix compression of low sensitive speakers.
I started upgrading my 1990 system with replacing my kef R105/3 speakers and I found to get equal quality from new speakers I have to spend 4 to 5 times what they cost and I’m still making some compromise. Electronics seem to actually sound better, but Either I’ve destroyed my ears or all these exotic materials are 95% marketing and 5%sonic improvements. My .02
the benchmark for me was a pair of circa 1982 maggie tympani III panel speakers demo'ed @ definitive audio in north seattle. precise imaging that could be heard all over the room without getting too warped. AND depth that made [on the right recordings] one think there was room beyond the end of the room where the speakers were speaking. a direct-disc recording of some cathedral organ transformed the room into the original recording venue, but for an almost palpable "cloud" of surface noise between me and the speakers. the music was back behind [literally] the surface noise cloud.  prolly the least efficient speakers ever made, a pair of class A monoblocks each the size of a dorm room fridge, were effectively heating the room too near to sauna levels for my long-term comfort. after sweating some, i left the room to listen to their little brothers, the SMGs. like a tiny version of their big brothers, without their seamless wall-to-wall omnipresent imaging, but with the essential tone quality and stereophonic imaging/depth, i was sold. they were the first truly high-quality speakers i had. before i had a pair of nova 6 acoustic suspension compact boxes, they were probably the mellowest speaker i'd heard outside of a pair of advents. neither could image anything like those maggies.