A civil discussion about the state of Audio Research


I invested considerable time yesterday expressing my thoughts as to the current state of Audio Research as a company from the standpoint of quality (positive) and customer service (negative) only to have the entire thread censored/deleted by the mods.
For the small subsection of this Country’s population that are home audio enthusiasts, Audio Research is an iconic brand. Moreso than any other company, AR was the torchbearer for tubes when the rest of the amp manufacturers were turning to solid state. Further, though there were a few duds here and there, I am hard-pressed to think of any other company that has made as many legendary models of amps and preamps that have withstood the test of time (imho only Krell, Spectral, and CJ come to mind and present era super-brands such as CH and DarTZeel lack the history necessary).
My point yesterday is that AR’s acquisition by a parent company has resulted in a dilution of brand identity-similar to when Volvo was acquired by Ford between ’99 and ’10 and suddenly cross pollination of parts and assembly took place. My second point is that unlike the car industry, audio is a niche industry and to refuse to interact with customers directly and to instead insist that the customer go through the local dealer is inexcusable. I think we would mostly agree that when one tries to call AT&T about one’s cable and internet service only to get a computer interface and then eventually a clueless third-party intermediary who barely speaks English in India, the entire experience is frustrating and inadequate. I have news (apparently) for the parent company of AR; the present system is not altogether different from getting a clueless intermediary in some remote country who can not really help you.
My local AD is not a top-notch audio salon. They don’t stock a single piece of AR gear in their showroom and primarily cater to home theater. They have one salesperson who has a history of owning AR gear and he only works part-time. More importantly, based on other accounts, I have no confidence that if I experience a catastrophic problem AR will treat me with respect and take care of me. I have heard nothing but the opposite. The human touch is gone. My local Devore dealer, a nationally respected one-man shop dealer-used to carry AR and thanks to several awful experiences since the take-over dropped AR and now sells VTL instead.
I am hoping that this thread results in a CIVIL and appropriate, mostly intelligent discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of AR and AR's future. If the mods wish to delete this post as well, fine, but I want a forum to post my concerns about AR and if this one won’t accommodate me, I will find another.
Again, for the record, I am the original owner of a Ref 6 and Ref 150SE and therefor have ~$30,000 invested in my amp and pre alone. A paltry sum by the standards of some, but not paltry to me.
128x128fsonicsmith
Another positive customer service experience to report for ARC.

I emailed several questions this week regarding my ARC integrated amplifier and various other inquiries, and received a very thorough and helpful response back within an hour.  Actually, quicker than that - probably within about twenty minutes!

I confirmed that they could still fully service and refresh my 10 year old integrated amplifier, and was advised that no need to rush into that so long as it is working great, which it is.  Maybe I'll give it another 5-10 years and then check back.  But it is comforting to know that they will be there with on-site factory service when/if I eventually need them, even for products decades old.

And I can get a replacement battery cover now for my ARC remote.  It's a minor thing, granted, but it's something that's been bugging me and I'm pretty sure the music will sound just that much sweeter when I replace that broken remote battery cover and don't have to be distracted by it as I settle in for a long evening of sonic bliss - haha!  

This was my first time contacting the company, and I was nervous about whether I'd even get a response based on some comments in this thread, but I can report that the responsiveness exceeded my expectations manyfold.  Thanks Audio Research!
One of the things that occurs to me is that alot of the negative experiences people relate in this thread which they ascribe to being the result of the buy-out may in fact have no relation to that whatsoever.  Long repair waits are not pleasant at all and there's no reason ARC should have a unit in house for repair for 5 weeks without carefully explaining why but I doubt it can be ascribed to the buyout.  I recently had an Aesthetix piece in repair for at least that long.  The parent firm purchased ARC to continue the legacy of what has been built up to this point, not to altar and throw away that legacy.  So far the new models that have come out from my perspective and I've listened to the new power amps and have the first amp the GS150 that was the fruit of that collaboration and its truly an awesome piece.  The design direction away from designs which incorporated numerous tubes in preamps and multiple tube gain stages which begged for experimenting with NOS tubes was made long before the acquisition.  So there's alot of conflating of different issues here which have nothing to do with the acquisition.