"Science is what gave us the medium and tools to enjoy music from the wax cylinder to digital storage and on to processes unknown. It won't be brain dead audiophiles arguing over $200 fuses and $10,000 cables and the shilers that promote them but the theoretician and engineer that fails and succeeds that moves us forward. Scientists who "argue" over the esoteric boundaries of QM have no interest in the mundane workings of basic sound reproduction."
Thanks again.
That exemplifies the kind of ignorance, to which I referred!
ie: Were it not for the study of QM and QED: there would be no, "digital storage" to enjoy. Nor: LASERs, transistors/semiconductors, home computers/laptops, smart phones, atomic clocks, GPS, MRIs, etc.
That's NOT any kind of debate. It's what's known as, "HISTORY"!
Talk about, "brain-dead"!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/everyday-quantum-physics/
Even the wiki-physicists have more understanding, than some in this forum (how pathetic):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_quantum_mechanics
Thanks again.
That exemplifies the kind of ignorance, to which I referred!
ie: Were it not for the study of QM and QED: there would be no, "digital storage" to enjoy. Nor: LASERs, transistors/semiconductors, home computers/laptops, smart phones, atomic clocks, GPS, MRIs, etc.
That's NOT any kind of debate. It's what's known as, "HISTORY"!
Talk about, "brain-dead"!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/everyday-quantum-physics/
Even the wiki-physicists have more understanding, than some in this forum (how pathetic):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_quantum_mechanics