Why is science just a starting point and not an end point?

djones51

You're unable to comprehend what was written or being intentionally obtuse.

It's odd that this site's self-proclaimed objectivists and measurementalists so often resort to classic ill logic - such as this ad hominem attack - rather than assert their position with reason. It just seems so inconsistent.

 That science has not yet provided us the means (tests or measurements) to explain why many of us hear the things we do, with the choices we make, in fuses, cables, etc: doesn't mean we don't.

Audio is just one of the hobby, it's your money, your choice, as long as you're happy, who am I to argue...

     My position has always been: with what we've learned from the studies and advancements, related to QM and QED: there are a multitude of possibilities; as to why we may hear the things we do, when listening to our own systems, in our own rooms, with our own ears, and our various add-ons.

      Even understanding in the Biological Sciences has been expanded/deepened, through the studies of QM, regarding how the senses and brain function, in many areas.

       BUT: it's been the history of science and invention; scoffers and naysayers WILL ALWAYS abound!

Quantum mechanics doesn't explain what you hear applying various  goopy substances to cables or rainbow colored fuses,  psychology does.