@mijostyn
You misunderstand our antipodean humour - @halcro and I have great mutual respect
You misunderstand our antipodean humour - @halcro and I have great mutual respect
Who needs a Diamond Cantilever...? 💍
When you have 2 identical carts, one regular cantilever and the other one with diamond cantilever (Koetsu Stones for example), the one with diamond cantilever shows more details, is a bit sharper in focus and the soundstage is a bit deeper and wider. They can sound a bit more detailed overall with improved dynamicsI’ll leave it at that for the time being. I will soon upload to YouTube, the sound comparisons between the two Sony versions on my HEAR MY CARTRIDGES THREAD.
Dear @halcro : Well, in your list of cartridges that are not any more with you all them have something in common: all came from different DESIGNERS that along other contemporary top LOMC ones all choosed boron build material for their cartridge designs and as edgewear pointed out to you the quality performance levels of many of those designs are really great. In the other side the market today very high price of LOMC cartridges is not way different that in the past where the top models had a very high market price for the market standards in those old times when existed a way way higher demand for cartridges against the very low number of today audiophiles that buy today LOMC cartridges. As @dover and several other gentlemans I don't buy a cartridge because its cantilever builed material and in specific if it's boron or beryllium with the vintage ones. I think that what you did not like it of your list cartridge performance is its overall quality levels that just is different from your audio/music priorities but not because boron. In the side of beryllium vs boron where you prefer beryllium it's the same but not because in specific of beryllium that's inferior to boron as cantilever material: beryllium Moh hardeness a low 5.5 vs 9.3 in boron and Young Modulus is almost the third of the boron. Two critical parameters for the cartridge cantilevers needs. Btw, it's really weird that you can't be aware if you are listenin to a MC cartridge or at MM/MI one. Maybe could be because your room/system can't " tell you "? Please do not diminish my next advise: could be that when you decide to make a really easy tests with the Wima/Kemet caps in your speakers you will listen those differences that exist between MC and MM/MI cartridges. Those Duelund are high colored caps. R. |
I am using a Beryllium Cantilever with Ogura Vital + Stylus that was installed into the Cartridge in 2019. This compared to the Ruby Cantilever used on the Original Design is noticeably improved and presents in a much more attractive manner. Hoow the Two different Stylus Shapes are contributing to the SQ differences is an unknown to myself. I recently tried to have another Cartridge produced with the same Beryllium/Ogura parts, but the option is no longer on offer. Boron is now the Material of choice I am looking at, hence the inquiry about the Gold Plated Option. |
Dear @dover : "
I have found every shibata tipped cartridge I have heard to be brittle... "" If I remember the original Shibata was used mainly for the CD-4 recordings and several vintage cartridges ( mainly MM. ) used to as the AT 20 Sla/SS that, between other shibata cartridges designs, I owned but at least with those AT I don't remember or can't remember that " characteristic " you mentioned. Btw, several design cartridges including today ones that in theory comes with Shibata in reality are " modified Shibata or Shibata like " but not the original Shibata shape. R. |
dover : The original Shibata ( same dimensions. ) stylus shape is used by Ortofon today and in other designs. You can read experiences with a Shibata design cartridges: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/classic-ortofon-cartridges-the-mc2000-mk-ii-or-the-mc3000-mk-... both the Jubilee and the Cadenza comes with that stylus shape. I owned the Jubilee and like me, no problem with. Yes, only opinions. R. |