I think the improvement in sound quality is pretty subtle, but it does seem to have a bigger effect the louder I play the system.@jaytor Thank you for your feedback. Your observations would be consistent with the theory: the louder, the more energy and distortions, scaling up exponentially with perceived loudness.
High-pass line filter to relieve main speakers from low frequency
Hi everybody
I recently purchased a subwoofer, KEF Kf92. It has a built in low-pass filter, 24 dB, that can be set from 40-140 Hz. They go with ATC SCM20sl. Their specs are: 80-20 kHz +/- 2 dB, 55-25 kHz : - 6 dB (free standing, which they are, actually: free hanging).
I wonder whether it would be beneficial to insert an high-pass filter before the power amp, consisting of a capacitor with a set point of 65 Hz. This filter might not have a huge impact because the frequency of the ATC SMC20sl rolls off quickly by itself below 80 Hz, apparently by about 12 dB/octave.
My thinking however is: the loudspeakers still receive the complete energy of the low bass from the amp. They might not be able to convert it into sound, but instead convert it into heat and distortion. So a filter will make the life of the amp and speaker easier, since at 33 Hz, only a quarter of the energy is produced.
Do you agree with me?
I recently purchased a subwoofer, KEF Kf92. It has a built in low-pass filter, 24 dB, that can be set from 40-140 Hz. They go with ATC SCM20sl. Their specs are: 80-20 kHz +/- 2 dB, 55-25 kHz : - 6 dB (free standing, which they are, actually: free hanging).
I wonder whether it would be beneficial to insert an high-pass filter before the power amp, consisting of a capacitor with a set point of 65 Hz. This filter might not have a huge impact because the frequency of the ATC SMC20sl rolls off quickly by itself below 80 Hz, apparently by about 12 dB/octave.
My thinking however is: the loudspeakers still receive the complete energy of the low bass from the amp. They might not be able to convert it into sound, but instead convert it into heat and distortion. So a filter will make the life of the amp and speaker easier, since at 33 Hz, only a quarter of the energy is produced.
Do you agree with me?
- ...
- 20 posts total
Post removed |
https://www.parts-express.com/FMOD-Crossover-Pair-100-Hz-High-Pass-266-274?gclid=CjwKCAjwmqKJBhAWEiw... They make inline filters (low and high) from 20hz up to at least 100 hz and down, THEN 15khz and up. AT LEAST.. It's a pro application, but works very well.. No need to add anything but the filters you like PRE power amp.. It won't affect the passive OX in the speaker.. Just the signal it receives from the amp. No SUB involved with steeper slopes like 24 or 48. The BOOM goes away and the timing (which is the problem) will become coherent. Reduced distortion, muddiness, bloated bass ALL goes away. Room treatment, main and sub decoupling are the real eye openers too. BUT limiting bass to the main is the BEST place to start, decoupling is right there though.. Room treatment is just the polish on a good, from ground up design.. Regards |
I was curious about the same thing. I decided to go this route. https://sound-au.com/project81.htm. I haven't built it yet, this fall or winter, but I have all the parts. I figured it would be a nice cold weather project. |
- 20 posts total