Critical listening and altered states


Ok, this is not a question about relaxing, but about listening to evaluate how the system (or a piece of gear is sounding).

What, in your experience, are the pluses and minuses of altering your state of mind for listening? This can include anything you've used to affect your everyday state of mind, from coffee, beer, scotch, tobacco, to much stronger — and psychoactive, dissociative — additives.

What do you gain by altering your consciousness in terms of what you notice, attend to, linger on, etc?
What causes more details to emerge?
What allows you to stick with a thread or, alternately, make new connections?

Or perhaps you like to keep all those things *out* of your listening; if that's you, please say a bit about why.

hilde45
@grannyring

Too bad the streaming versions of Anna Netrebko, Sempre Libera distort terribly. Sounds like she is clipping her mic. Not sure, but not playable at moderately loud levels. First time I have heard this sort of popping/fluttering distortion when streaming. Both Tidal and Qobuz have the same issue with this recording.

tonight when i get home i will try the Tidal and Quboz versions of that cut and compare them to my dsd and 24/88 files and report back. i don’t recall those artifacts from the streaming versions, but it’s been awhile since i listened to them.

if you can download the file, it’s a worthy recording to own if you like the music.

i’ve been using this cut as a reference for over 10 (maybe 15) years now. initially it was the SACD disc that i used. i would listen to both the dsd and redbook layers. then later i got the 24/88 file and found it was clearly better as it was the native file. then when i got my MSB Select II (a bit-perfect dac) the native file was even better by a larger margin.

none of those versions ever had distortion like the clipping you are describing. it was more levels of clarity and degrees of delicacy.
I like the way the guy with the best selection of liquor I ever seen right outside his listening room door chooses instead from a range of fine bottled water. Scratch that. Not seen. Tasted. Enjoyed. Relished. He also has some to die for master tapes. But what I really want to know Mikelavigne is where oh where can I get me some of that Angel’s Envy???
Something not addressed regarding the altered states of critical creation.  Much of the music we adore comes at the detriment of the artist who created it.

There is an interesting article about Charlie Parker and how his heroin addiction contributed to his genius.
https://nypost.com/2017/02/05/charlie-parkers-heroin-addiction-helped-make-him-a-genius/

Jimi Hendrix, Amy Winehouse, Kurt Cobain.  

Was Rickie Lee Jones much more creative as an alcoholic?
The Beatles took a lot of hallucinogenic (and other) drugs to create some of the best music of all time.

I'm not suggesting opioid use for anyone but alternate states of mind can allow you to make connections that weren't there previously.  They can be a training tool to help you listen differently.  

Whether you imbibe, don't imbibe believe in power cables or not it's all a personal choice.  We still have the ability to choose.

I really miss these artists but would I if they hadn't partook in the poison that killed them? 
Post removed 
Post removed