Referent point


Look if we are going to get anywhere in this discussion on speakers,,,we've been at here now going on 20years +, We need to figure out how we are going to go forward into this 21st C, which now is 21 yrs and going.
Time to establsih some sort of reference posit, a  speaker that we  can all agree on which is neutral, efficient and worthy to be considered true high fidelity, Last qualification, is that any amp can drive the Speaker, From  Jadis JA 800 monos blaocsk a  4 chassis 800 lb amplifier to a  1 watt SET amp.
Sure I realize this is asking for the impossible, 
'But really its not.
There is such speakers.
These would be the wide bands.
You know the Fostex/Lowther you atried back in the day and found less than high fidelity.
Well we should not throw the babt out with the  bath water.
The wide bands were developed in Berlin and Chicago back in the 1920;s. and IMHO are the finest design in any speaker (exception are the horns).
We can not make the big horns as reference, as few of us here can afford the big guys, + many other issues which make  horns not a  practical reference point.\
The only speaker i know that can fill the parameters to be designated as The Reference Point, as wide bands.
All speakers  must be judged next to a  high tech wide band.
Wide bands will expose the glares and flaws in your speaker, which are completely hidden from your ears at the moment.
I mean if we are all seeking true high fidelity  its high time to face the facts of 
1) bigger is not better
2) throwing money at a  speaker will result in great sound
3) thinking outside the box is  the creative approach to discovering high fidelity.
4) a  lab name means nothing when heard next to a  high tech wide band.(We can lay this blame at Sterophiles feet)


mozartfan
Kipschhorns
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My tech has some issues with Klipsch, ,,,,yet is a horn and thus beats low sens box speakers any day on midrange. Klipsch beats Wilsons in midrange I have no doubts about

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


And a well recorded vocal through the QUAD ESL.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tech mentions these are a true legendary speaker.
yat again, has issues, needs power = possible  to use as a reference speaker,,,, but with issues =  so we have to cancel Quads. 
We are looking for a speaker that anyone can employ with any amp,
From ARC, To Rotel to A-Z. 1 watt to 1K watts.
Voicing 40hz-12khz and no fatigue, no distortion. natural, neutral, clean voice. 

Big challenge I know.
But I’m thinking I may have found such a speaker..
anuyway,,, my vid should be uploaded by now,,and I try to explain everything in the video.
All I ask is some consideration, some reflection on what I’m trying to get across.
I really thought I was the 1st to make this discovery, but someone here altered me that others also have been working with this wide band + low sens speaker combo.
I call speakers low sens,
We need to start working with proper characterization.
Wide Bnads/Full Range/Point source.
I think these should be called
The High sens
and all other box/xover types as
The Low sens.
Because that is exactly what they are, low sensitivity speakers.
Numbers dont mean anything now.
Labs are making specs look as if their speakers are mid sens to high sens.
I don’t trust Seas nor Scanspeaks specs.
Those nombers have beome meaningless.
Yet there are wide bands also that also suffer from sens issues, maybe mid sens at best.
1 db is alot lot, when involved in speaker producing music.
Is the speaker a true 87db?
Is a wide band a true 92db?
When you intergrate a true 92 db wide band, the side speaker , does not matter what the sens really truly is.
The main speaker now is the 92 sens wide band.
here is where 90% of your music is comming from and is most of what you are hearing.
Your Wilson, Vandersteen, Thiel , Sonus Faber are only being employed as helpers, Nada mas.
The star of the show, the Soprano and Tenor is the wide band.
Yes I am aware I dumping over the apple cart.
But its loaded with rotten apples.
Needed to be dumped, long over due.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaOiIttqZs8




Silly premise. There can't be an absolute reference speaker and there shouldn't be.
The Bose 901 series.  The reference doesn't have to be the best.  It can start at the bottom too.  Think of them as analog to the Mendoza Line.
Post removed 
@onhwy61

i think few mouth-breathing mono-brow audiophiles will know what the Mendoza Line is. and that is not the bottom, more the beginning of the bottom.

i was a Mariner fan in the late 70’s and early 80’s, when Mario and his wonder glove roamed the Kingdome. he could pick it and throw it. and hit just enough to stay in the line-up of a perennial second division team like the Mariners.

the Bose 901’s are more Triple A.....not really Major League. i owned 901’s from 1976 to 1978. kinda sucked. the bottom of the bottom. best thing about them was i could hang them from the ceiling so my baby daughter and son did not destroy them.