Tang Band 2145 in action

listening to the Tang band 2145 in the video,, I know why I chose the DavidLouis VX8 over it.
But I will say at $250, really nice speaker,  almost equal to the Davidlouis, highs a  bit higher.

Look why don't you guys PM each other , come up with a  top dawg xover type  which midrange will match, equal, or surpass the Davidlouis VX8's midrange...
, None of you will come to any agreement,. Everyone will have their own vote and so will never arrive at a   model that makes midrange so beautiful as a  high tech WBer.

Whereas the 2 WB's I mentioned, along with the more expensive models, AER, Voxativ, all 4 will carry midrange with a  high degree of fidelity and  purity, cohesiveness/seamless  imagery.

This is their inner strength.
The heart  and soul of our music is in the midrange. 

So- other than the shelved off bass, what else needs help?
There is an emphasis in the mid treble, which does make that range a bit hot to me, with excess sibilance.

the upper mids also seem pushed a bit; this may or may not be due to a 4.8khz. resonance in the woofers.

So- what’s the bottom line? This standard, basic version gives a real taste of vey high end sound at a true bargain price.

I am posting again what I posted several days ago. The quotes above are direct copy and paste from the review you posted. They are his words, not mine. I just agree.

Coloration??
Did you read the link review I posted above.
3rd indepentent party, unbiased, down to earth review of the Seas Thors.

So the answer is yes, I did read the independent 3rd party review, and he agreed with my assessment. Again, you just cherry-picked what agreed with what you are pushing. Not the actual conclusion of the reviewer.

The cease and desist comment was an over exaggeration to make a point. However, your videos are doing those companies no favors. If I owned the company, I wouldn’t want you speaking for my product at all. You have no clue what you are doing.

your videos are doing those companies no favors. If I owned the company, I wouldn’t want you speaking for my product at all. You have no clue what you are doing.


There are countless YT vids on A-Z  speakers,, I can trans at least some of the sound present in the vids.
Thats all i am attempting to do,.
Give those interested in WBer's a  tiny morsel, a  taste of what they might expect.

The listener can take it or leave it.

I cautally can hear things in the YT vid of the TB2145, that is now clear why I stayed with the davidLouis VX8. 
(although I could not return the DLVX* back to china..) I was actually thinking in running both as a pair, likea  stacked WBer experiement..
In a large room, it might work. 

Ina  lrage room and folks like high SPL, you could stack duals but both the same.
Dual Tang Band 2145's would work beautifully for a  massive sound stage.
It would be a  **WOW** experience.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxvVk-r9ut8

So- what’s the bottom line? This standard, basic version gives a real taste of vey high end sound at a true bargain price.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually  did not read the Thor review, just a  snipet.

So a  taste of VERY high end.
Yeah thats accurate.

Not sure if you are aware the Millennium tweet is well known as a very accurate tweeter.
I sold the new pair off in 2 hours on Ebay at 60% off. 
2 HOURS!!!!
But at 87db , not workable for my preferences with  a   tiny 3/4 inch VC, vs the WBers  gorgeous whizzer, which radiates  wider expanse of  highs. 
I just like the fact all 3  fq's 's are sourced at one point.
 Also
 For a  really nice sound exp for my classical muisc which requires sensitivity to pick up low flute notes, and tiny hits of percussions.
Bottom line, i get everything the Millennium offered, but at a higher sensitivity.