Single driver vs traditional 3 way loudspeakers


What you prefer , single driver , no crossover, full   range  loudspeakers powered by low power SAT  or traditional 2-3 way design ?
128x128bache
mozartfan said:
"Most folks have no clue how to hear, listen and judge a speaker."

But you do? You contradict yourself left and right. Zu beats Wilson, but then you watch a youtube video of Zu speakers, (now that's definitive...) and decide that they're not your cup of tea. You are a mess. 
Yes I made FUTHER more through research hearing soem YT vids of the Zu's. Not my cup of tea. Not neutral, sorry no cigar.
A speaker must possess this one quality
Neutrality. 
If it does not have neutral voice, then you will have issues. One guy ona  chart forum tried to console and comfort  a  Tek buyer with deep regrets, after his snakeoil induced purchase... saying 
**Look I have my Acoustic Reserach AR3's now 50 yrs, I am quite happy*.
So I guess each his own. 
Zu's are far from neutral. 

now that's definitive

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well its only IMHO
Others can make their ow call, 
Zu does have a  super duper generous return policy.
What happened was , I was INITALLY convinced the Zu's propiatary  driver was unique and very musical.
I was wrong. 
They are not, agian, Its only my opinion, 
Feel free to order as you can always return. 
I'm staying with my Davidlouis/AER clone.  Well actually Vox clone, as the cone is wood same as Vox's $5k model.
The DLVX8 has neutrality as a signature  voice.
Hear my YT vids if you have doubts.
Its all in my  videos. 
Yeah I did earlier pump Zu;s, now I am speaking out with futher research. 
Aplogies to Mr Zu.