Single driver vs traditional 3 way loudspeakers

Yes I made FUTHER more through research hearing soem YT vids of the Zu's. Not my cup of tea. Not neutral, sorry no cigar.
A speaker must possess this one quality
Neutrality. 
If it does not have neutral voice, then you will have issues. One guy ona  chart forum tried to console and comfort  a  Tek buyer with deep regrets, after his snakeoil induced purchase... saying 
**Look I have my Acoustic Reserach AR3's now 50 yrs, I am quite happy*.
So I guess each his own. 
Zu's are far from neutral. 

now that's definitive

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well its only IMHO
Others can make their ow call, 
Zu does have a  super duper generous return policy.
What happened was , I was INITALLY convinced the Zu's propiatary  driver was unique and very musical.
I was wrong. 
They are not, agian, Its only my opinion, 
Feel free to order as you can always return. 
I'm staying with my Davidlouis/AER clone.  Well actually Vox clone, as the cone is wood same as Vox's $5k model.
The DLVX8 has neutrality as a signature  voice.
Hear my YT vids if you have doubts.
Its all in my  videos. 
Yeah I did earlier pump Zu;s, now I am speaking out with futher research. 
Aplogies to Mr Zu.

My tech geek just wrote
**Its impossible to tell what a speaker is like via YT vid  w comp speakers*

WEll lets say you hear biden's voice and then trumps voice via  YT vid, with no image
Other than both blabbing BS content, you can't decipher who is who speaking?
Is what I wrote back.
Lets see what he says.
I can hear some issues with Zu's YT vids. 
Its there, what exactly, not sure but just dont like what i hear. 
But with a  return policy  there is no risk
So single driver  but has to be high fidelity = neutrality.
Just any old single driver will not always beat a  3 way. 
Most every Tang Band will indeed outshoot Wilsons, Dali, Sonus Faber. 
3 BIG GUNs. = $$$$$$$$$$