HiFi vs MidFi

the Sonus Faber sounds better

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh yeah, i see what you are saying
Sonus Faber has a big name attached **they have to must sound better* than my Frankensteins.. 
ok got it.
wait til The Speaker Project is complete.
Gonna run a  WBer 3 way with Beryllium neo tweeter.
Lets see what Sonus Faber can do.
The Guarneri has the super neo magnet. 
Thats all it has going for  it.
Ck out the price, ck out the web page.
I never went in for commercial. My Thors came as a kit.
Trust me the Guarneri's ain;t going to outshoot a  Seas W18EX001 /Millennium. 
That Guarneri is so over priced. 

A guy in a   Armani suit who has no sensibility to know what is high fidelity.

https://www.sonusfaber.com/en/products/guarneri-tradition/

Guarneri's made Sterophiles front page. 
There you go, ck out price on last page
My Frankensteins will not ever make Sterophile.
So Sonus faber MUST BE superior.
A speaker is ONLY great IF it makes Sterophile's  front page NEWS.
Got it.
Not going to stop my The Speaker Project from completion. 
https://www.stereophile.com/content/sonus-faber-guarneri-tradition-loudspeaker

besides any speaker can sound pretty darn good with the Miles Davis Kind of Blue cd. 
Even unto the B7W's. 
But not Bose, Bose is a intercom speaker at the  high school cafateria. 

Oh yeah, i see what you are saying
Sonus Faber has a big name attached **they have to must sound better* than my Frankensteins..

Well, no you didn't see what I was saying, because what I actually said was this.

 Nothing to do with the name, nothing to do with the manufacturer of the drivers. It is about how it sounds. It sounds coherent, yours doesn't, at least to me. Period. I could care less who made the drivers or designed the speaker.

Judging of sound quality is on an absolute scale and has nothing to do with price. On the absolute scale, yours don't cut it, IMO. 

Trust me the Guarneri's ain;t going to outshoot a Seas W18EX001 /Millennium.

Well, I actually listened to the videos of both and I couldn't disagree with you more. The SF win that shootout in a landslide. Sorry.

A guy in a  Armani suit who has no sensibility to know what is high fidelity.

If you are referring to me, I don't own an Armani suit. I am just an average working person that happens to think your Frankenstein is not even mediocre sounding. You enjoy it, that is all that matters.

You are the one with no clue about high fidelity. Video after video that you have posted prove that beyond any doubt.

If you are referring to me, I don’t own an Armani suit.

~~~~~~~~The guy listening to the Guarneri hasa Gorgio Armani suit on.
AS if that alone is convincing,,a guy with big bucks of course choses only the very best, = Sonus Fqaber
What a bunch of snakeoil’

Trust me the Seas Thors if you are not aware are bench mark gold standard 2 ways.
Dont believe me, go to Troel Gravesen’s web page.
There he shares his opinions on Seas EXCEL speakers.

The Excel midwoofers are pure neutral, with zero overhang resonances up to say 1800hz.
2khz its pushing the limit.
Which is why i runa 10uf cap up to say 1600hz.
Midwoofers such as Scan speak and Seas can’t compete witha good quality WBer.
You no doubt have not yet heard a 1st class WBer so you have no idea what I am trying to say.
My WBer will outshoot the Guarneri.
Why?
db sensitivity thats why.
I’ve gone over this fact, tested and true, so many times here past few months.
I can’t explain further.
If we get 10 giolden ear aupdiophiles judgeing between my WBer system vs any Sonus Faber,,of course unanimous vote Sonus Faber, SF gets the Cigar
My WBer system get the cigar butt, as a consolation prize.


THE Industry must always wins. 
Stereophile Magazine says yes, this is so true. Out team must always win.
Popular vote always wins,
Consumerism, commercialism.
I just posted 2 vids of my Thors and WBers,

can’t you hear??
You may need better computer speakers. 
Sorry not at all impressed with any of the Sonus Faber models.
Miles Davis?
Any speaker can pull off Miles Davis.
Exception The Bose which is not a speaker any hoot.