jeroboam - for the record, your 2.4s were made in Lexington with masonite point to point XO boards with American / European passive parts, and best-of-form wire. I and others consider them to be better than the later units with Chinese XOs and wire.
In my explorations, I was impressed by the level of plateau-optimization of that product. Every element is as good as every other element, so that no money was wasted in the implementation. The exception is the drivers. I (and others) have replaced components and topologies, and the speaker gets better and better. But, at considerable cost. My work is to produce an upgrade at the top of the next cost pleateau: wasting no money while performing at a higher level. We have done it a few times on a few products and one of these days we'll have ways and methods to implement those changes for those who wish.
In my explorations, I was impressed by the level of plateau-optimization of that product. Every element is as good as every other element, so that no money was wasted in the implementation. The exception is the drivers. I (and others) have replaced components and topologies, and the speaker gets better and better. But, at considerable cost. My work is to produce an upgrade at the top of the next cost pleateau: wasting no money while performing at a higher level. We have done it a few times on a few products and one of these days we'll have ways and methods to implement those changes for those who wish.