2. amps-preamps
  3. 126624-10101

My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!

So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
viber6
2,448 posts
 

I gather that just playing CD's is better sounding than streaming or local files of the same recording.  Is that the experience of people here?

dbarger,

Comparing my CD's and LP's of the same recording, here is my experience over many years.  With my young Denon 305 MC cartridge with ultradetailed Belles phono stage (a Pass XP15 phono stage was a veiled dog by comparison), detailed Alphason HR100S tonearm on Goldmund Studio TT, the LP was far more detailed with especially HF openness.  As my Denon 305 cartridge aged, the CD is now better.  I have a refurbished Denon 305 which I haven't mounted yet, but the old 305 is still satisfactory.

Euphonic cartridges like Koetsu and many TT's make analog merely euphonic, so any decent digital system is far more revealing than these analog systems, so I think Jay is on the right track with digital.  Analog isn't worth the hassle, unless you like forgiving sound.

 

keithr
1,306 posts
 

It's not just the vinyl rig cost and setup - it's the PITA to find good vinyl and the 000s to buy your first 100 titles. There aren't $1 vinyls at garage sales anymore. And the audiophile stuff is $40-$50 per record. Unless I had a record collection given to me or something similar, MSB digital is so good now I don't find analog necessary. Especially if you listen to modern recordings.

Although a AAA remastered recording on vinyl is a special experience and keeps me from selling the Brinkmann rig. 

psnyder149's avatar
psnyder149
160 posts
 

@keithr +1,

I have a pretty basic Linn LP12 rig with 1000+ records with a wet vac cleaner. And much as I appreciate great vinyl--and it does rival or exceed digital in some areas, I have made the decision to forgo seriously upgrading my analogue capabilities. I will enjoy and keep what I have even though I know there are much better upgrades available and focus on improving digital and the rest of my system.

 

If I was starting from scratch, I would not recommend going vinyl unless a person feels absolutely compelled to do so. It is lots of work, both in set up and maintenance as well in execution; i.e. shopping for records, properly cleaning and preparing a record plus the work to the physical work to play and change from one record to another... and I am a person who often listens to complete records! Jay, listens to songs and has over a million at his finger tips with streaming from the comfort of his listening chair. I’m not saying he is lazy. I think he just likes to change music often and values convenience. 99% of my listening is digital, even though the way I listen is far more conducive to the 5 minutes it takes to put on a new slab!

 

Long live vinyl! But I think Jay is the wrong candidate to launch into vinyl this late in his audiophile journey.

psnyder149's avatar
psnyder149
160 posts
 

viber6,

I have found that playing music locally stored on an SSD yields the best digital sound.  I have a 4 TB drive on an Innuos ZenMini with external power supply and around 2TB of music installed (both Red Book and high resolution).  Convenience is A+ and sound quality exceeds both spinning discs and streaming although the differences with streaming vs local have been greatly reduced.  

 

I still give a slight edge to locally stored vs. streamed for audio quality and have retired my dedicated transport and just use my Oppo BluRay player in the rare instance that I am spinning a physical disc (normally only for HD CD's that I can't or don't know how to rip).  At 10x the price of my ZenMini, I would expect these differences to be even greater with Jay's Taeko as I know that even within the Innuos line, the Statement and the Zenith are both much better than ZenMini. 

We could have a technical discussion of why a ripped cd will play better than the original disc but hopefully it is sufficient to say that mechanical controls that constantly are adjusting the speed of the CD during playback (linear speed is constant which dictates that rotational speed of the disc must constantly be adjusted--slowed down as you move from beginning (inner disc) to end (outer disc)introduce a ton of jitter.  Additionally, I have found that crazy things like green paint and less crazy things like vibration isolation and absorption all seriously impact playback.  Playing from a digitally identical copy while eliminating the playback mechanism makes it far less difficult to reduce the jitter and other distortions of a transport.

Also, I have found that full, non-compressed files sound better than lossless, compressed files and I am now leaning towards preferring flac to aiff.  Lossy compression should never be considered a viable option with the low cost of disc drives except for portable media (iphones and airplane rides!).  Like zprr, I'm surprised Jay is having such a dropoff in sound quality with streaming, I would expect with the Taeko that differences would be subtle.  I suspect he has something going on with his internet provider, capabilities/speed, modem, router, switches, cables, etc...  I couldn't agree more with the statement... "everything matters". 

mikem
260 posts
 

@psnyder149  

Great post, I agree with many of your findings. Files played off of SSD sound better to me as well. I also started to rip my CD's to WAV files as they sound better, less processing, just I/O for a shorter path internally.

Just want to add, ripping to CD's allows the OS to do CRC & checksuming for bitperfect integrity as well. unlike a transport where most do No error checking or have the ability to reread. 


 

More to discover