Looking For A Dialogue Around Using An Ortofon MC2000 In My Current System


As a bit of history, I used to work in a stereo store part time as a college student. This store was an Ortofon dealer and the owner was a fan of the MC2000, and we typically had one in the store. I was too poor to afford it, but it was always on my want list. Last week I came across an MC2000 on an audio site and bought it. This one is as close to a time capsule as we can get for vintage MC cartridges. While not NOS its in perfect shape with Ortofon outer box, Styrofoam, intter box, all the tools, the graphs, two stylus guards, and even an Ortofon stick pin I presume for you to wear to audio shows to signify you are an MC2000 owner. The stock and irreplaceable cantilever is there and its straight, and rides high. Of course the unknown is diamond wear, and so I am planning to send it out for evaluation and consideration for diamond replacement. 

 

Now the question becomes how to use it. First comes a suitable arm. I have two Dynavector DV505 for a Scheu Das Laufwerk No2 turntable that I can use, and also a Supex SL4 headshell that weighs 5.5 grams or so. I have the stock headshell that comes with the MC2000, but that looks to weigh 10 grams, and this cartridge is highly compliant. I also have a SME V that is spec'd between 10 and 11 grams. I almost consider the SME to be the best match for this application, but then that regulated the number of hours I might use that table as the MC2000 isn't going to be a daily driver cartridge. 

 

Next question is how to get enough gain for it. The owner apparently has the T2000, but is unwilling to part with it at this time. So ideally I would like to find a T2000. I also have an MC3000, and so need the step up for it, and I happen to also have a MC200u. My Esoteric E-03 has 40 db of gain on MM mode, and I have a Graham Slee Accession that is 41.5 dB of gain. The Esoteric is 66 dB in MC mode. So until I locate a T2000 I wondered what options I have. Jensen makes a high output SUT that is 31 dB of gain and seems to be the best choice. I do not see any active pre-pre amps that can do the job. Any thoughts here?

 

As a crazy thought, the Accession has a direct mode that bypasses all RIAA equalization, so its really a pre pre amp then. But placing the Esoteric ahead of it means you are looking at a gain structure of over 80 dB. Probably not a good idea, but I wonder if it could work. Just brainstorming here. Of course the perfect solution is to find a T2000, or even in a pinch a T3000 for the interim till I do locate a T2000. Problem is these SUT have collectors value and they seem to go for silly money these days. But that is what it is, and you have to pay the piper. 

 

So any thoughts on the best way to get this MC2000 integrated into the system?

neonknight

@neonknight  : Never mind, not important but thank's.

 

Btw, in one of my MC2000 samples I sended to VDH for a change of cantilever/stylus and I did it not because it need it but to compare aginst the original and my experience is that with the boron cantilever and VDH stylus the cartridge is way better quality performer.

 

R.

Post removed 

L., maybe not in " trouble " and it's just that you like a different kind of distortions.

 

Nothing wrong with that and sorry to disturb you.

 

R.

@rauliruegas 

 

Afraid I don't see the point. No one has ever claimed it to be competitive with the finest cartridges of today. I have a Transfiguration Audio Proteus and ZYX 4D that satisfy me in that category, and have owned and sold several other quality modern cartridges. 

From a historical perspective it was considered one of the best cartridges in the world at its time. It will be interesting to hear what it is capable of, as it provides a great reference point of what was available in the mid to late 1980s. 

 

Whether this is a "good cartridge" or something above or below that is a matter of perspective and individual interpretation, which is a large portion of this hobby if we are being honest, and this determination is not being conducted with any kind of objective testing that can generate a hierarchal  ranking based on data. 

I am just curious to hear what the performance differences are between some of my current modern cartridges and a historical classic that was once considered to be the among the top tier of cartridges available. Add into equation that this cartridge has value to me from a personal perspective, and that makes the act of ownership a bit more special. 

Well, I own/owned not one MC2000 but 3 new samples. I will delete my post that does not like you. No problem.

 

R.