My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

Jay, just finished reading your Harmon news release link about the new ML-50 monoblocks. Looks interesting, but these amps should have better looking handles for a $50K pricing...They are look too much in your face IMHO. I think that Harmon wanted to give the ML-50 a similar esthetical look as the previous ML-23.5 amp. They should have kept the handles in black for the ML-50...I also understand that this is a very subjective topic, but this is my 2 cents 😉.

@chayro 

You make great points and i agree i am planning to build around the Mephisto. However, if you build around the mephisto which in my opinion is the most neutral amp i have owned, chances are that whatever partnering gear you chose will probably sound awesome with many other amps I bring home (at least 9 times out of 10). 

Also, dont forget i mentioned that the simaudio is also not sounding great with this outlet so that gives me a second data point. Look, if i end up hating the furutech outlets then i have no issues removing them and selling them, but i have to give them at least 500 hours. I am NOT waiting longer than that. If at 500 hours they havent come back around then they are exiting my room and i will finish the job with Shunyata outlets. 

chayro,

As a violinist, I also did recording of classical ensembles on an amateur level, still with top Neumann mikes, Bryston mike preamp, etc.  I'll take your word that in rock/pop/jazz, the mastering engineers tailor the production sound to what they think will work well in typical audio systems.  All this is processed sound on many levels, so the concept of seeking high fidelity on playback is lost.  These listeners cannot say whether one component is more accurate than another, so they naturally choose whatever components please them the most.  

But there is very little, if any, processing in classical recordings.  Most of it remains confined to multi-mike recordings of complex large ensembles on large stages.  Even as a performer sitting in the violin section of the orchestra, I experience how instruments close to me sound crisp and clear, but instruments and voices in the back of the stage sounded muddy, with excessive reverb.  So I understand the benefits of multi-mike techniques, which do clarify more of the instruments and voices, although the spatial perspective is not natural.  Mercury Living Presence classical recordings are the best and most natural ever made, with no processing and few mikes used.

For the rock/pop listener, an accurate amp like Mephisto may well be paired with warm, forgiving components for the reasons above.  However, if the goal is highest accuracy and fidelity such as in classical recordings, it is desirable to have every component dedicated to the same goals of accuracy.   This is easy to understand.  One end of the spectrum involves having all components forgiving, so there are 10 veils of sound clouding the transparency.  The opposite end, a system with complete transparency, involves ZERO veils.  Nobody has a completely transparent system, but we can achieve perhaps 1-2 veils, and then hear much more of the music coming through.  This is done by having all components devoted to accuracy.  Yes, some people think of the Mephisto as exposing flaws, but on a positive note, it has the highest accuracy and transparency for revealing more musical content.  

Jay stated himself that the Mephisto mono is the best amp he has owned.  Why?  He finally realized he is bored with the homogenization from other amps.  With those amps, all music sounds decent, but not at the cutting edge level he now wants.  If he seeks the same from other components, he will attain the highest cutting edge level, coming closest to complete transparency.

Jay, 

I realize that many people with more experience than I have recommended various better outlets.  But even with the best outlets, there is still the power quality coming in, which Mike Fremer wrote about as what nearly killed his excellent system.  I predict you will still experience these frustrations unless the power quality is fully addressed.  I have been only partly successful with my Shunyata Denali 6000, original version.  Ricevs probably has the best knowledge in this area.  You could get the Goal Zero Yeti battery/inverter models, or the Stromtank big guns offered by Dan D'Agostino.  Lots of clutter from all these units, but they are probably the best solution to this perennial problem.

@viber6 - I definitely hear what you are saying and I have a lot of experience with acoustic music as I play(ed) several instruments and have my degree in music. And I assure you there is no sarcasm intended in my comments to come.  First, I don't think Jay listens to unamplified acoustic music, at least not that I have seen.  But that's not really important. From an intellectual standpoint only - if you want to boil it down, it seems that the decision that the Mephistos are the most neutral is based on the impression that it makes most associated equipment sound bad.  Obviously, that is an overly simplistic analysis, but I think there is some truth there.  And as to the way acoustic music is recorded, yes some companies like MA, Water Lily and Reference use minimal miking and processing, but I have attended several classical recording sessions at RCA studios back in the day, and the engineers used tons of microphones and large amounts of EQ to get things sounding "good" to the people paying the bills. And even as far as those audiophile recordings I mentioned above, don't the engineers select the microphones, recording equipment, room and mic positioning to get the sound that they like?  Again, It is not my intention to say anyone is wrong in their personal quest for the absolute sound, as some call it. I am just wondering if it just really all boils down to "I like the way that sounds" in the end.  I don't know. That's the way we used to buy stereos.  We'd go into Crazy Eddie, Stereo Warehouse or wherever and say "I like that one". And we took it home and never worried about whether it was accurate. I think it's interesting.