Underpowered?


Hi guys.  Newbie here asking for advice. 

I recently purchased a pair of B&W 702 Signature (8Ω, 30-300W, 90 dB) to replace my old faithful 683s (8Ω, 20-200W, 90 dB).  I am running them with a McIntosh MA252 (100W into 8Ω, 160W into 4Ω).  I purchased them thinking they would complete my end-game system.  However, my excitement turned into disappointment when I realized the lows were somewhat lacking.  For all their faults, the 683s had a great dynamic low kick (no sub) that I was looking to take one step further.  Unsurprisingly, the highs and mids on the 702s were indeed more detailed and separation was clearer, but I couldn't get over the uninspiring lows.  I found myself listening at higher volumes chasing for that bass oomph.  Neither playing with the EQ at the source nor the amp was satisfactory.  So, I did the research that perhaps I should've done before purchasing the 702s and found out they are quite power hungry despite the specs being similar to the 683s.  I emailed B&W and McIntosh and they agreed the amp is probably underpowered for the 702s.  B&W described the sound of an underpowered speaker as one lacking low response and details, which is spot on. McIntosh suggested the MA352 (200W into 8Ω, 320W into 4Ω).

Of note, I love the MA252 and really wish there was a way to make this work.  I don't need a DAC/streamer/etc so I'm happy to put all my money on better sound vs tech features.  But I also think the speakers sound amazing even when somewhat underpowered and I'm considering upgrading to a MA352, Michi X3, Hegel 390.  Another option could be to get a sub? But I feel that would defeat the purpose of having a 3way standing speaker and then I might as well get a pair of bookshelf speakers (805 D4s, LS50 metas?).

So what do you guys think? Is it normal for a speaker that's rated 30-300W to be underpowered with a 100W amp?? What would you do:

  1. Sell the 702s and look for a better match for my MA252?

  2. Upgrade the MA252 (MA352? Michi X3? NAD 33?)?

  3. Get a subwoofer?

I would really appreciate your thoughts/advice!

dridel

If you go with  subs, you will need an active crossover or DSP to roll the lows off your 702’s. Then the Mac will have more than enough power!
I still have an ancient audio research crossover for such needs.

All the best.

JD

Upgrade the Mac MA252 to the 352.   I recently purchased the 352 to replace my MA6900.  It 's power is 200 watts into 8 ohms, 320 watts into 4 ohms.  A doubling of power over the 252.  And it has 5 equalizer buttons, just like my former 6900.  It is basically a more powerful 252 with equalizer buttons.

Of course McIntosh suggested you need a higher powered amp from them. 😏 I'd also say a subwoofer would be preferable to buying a different amp that probably won't make any objective difference whereas a sub most definitely will.

So what do you guys think? Is it normal for a speaker that’s rated 30-300W to be underpowered with a 100W amp?? What would you do:

  1. Sell the 702s and look for a better match for my MA252?

  2. Upgrade the MA252 (MA352? Michi X3? NAD 33?)?

  3. Get a subwoofer?

I would really appreciate your thoughts/advice!

#1 - do you like the speakers?

#2 - Those Purifi Eigentakt do not look as good as a Mac. But they likely have the cojones.

As ​​​​​​@ctsooner mentioned there is the Vandy sub, which is sort of an active alternative to the DSP based approach. And that folds back into #2 as some load is relieved off of the speakers and amp.

 

I know nothing about the B&W, but are you smitten with them?
If not there are probably some other options.

They do appear top be a bit weak on the lower registers:

 

can't believe it's not enough power unless you're in a monster size room. Systems have oomph if they're dynamically linear and that can be limited by a speaker with a lousy impedance load and/or an amp that can't handle the load. My gut feeling is it's the speakers.

A common recommendation for non-dynamic speakers is to add power and play loud. This doesn't really provide linear dynamic level changes but loudness compensates some for a lack of life in reproduction.