Opinions on Pure Audio Project Quintet 15 Horn 1 Please

@dagda

i believe you are thinking about this correctly, and have identified the most significant risk

it is too bad, on paper, these speakers hold a great deal of promise but the trial aspect can be costly and cumbersome

big speakers, expensive, less-than-well-established maker, home base of maker far far away -- makes it tough! 😨

PAP products are a waste of money. 

Good marketing, nice Facebook group where all new owners congratulate each other. As for the equipment heavy, big, cumbersome, bad quality, bad finish, bad sound. And once you are sufficiently frustrated You can't give them away.

triedafew-

Your hurling a lot of trash at Pure Audio Project. Any concrete examples of why you're saying this? Did you contact them with your concerns?.. Any response?

@coachpoconnor
@triedafew 
The fact that ’triedafew’ is a new register (September 2021) with only 2 posts...both of which are negative posts about Pure Audio Project...
That tells me everything I need to know about the guy :)

I'm very interested in the PAP Trio15 Horn version as i would like to try something very different to my beloved Thiel CS 3.7s.

I'm planning to get Jadis amplification for my Thiel therefore this would also work great on Trio15s.

My room is medium size therefore Trio15s should be good enough.

What do you guys think about having OB speakers to complement box speakers ?

I think i can audition the PAPs at Munich in 2024 before making a decision.