About users with hidden agendas

As for the lies about me taking down my threads, this is false as I have proven with the links above.

so you leaned on the mods just like I alleged - same outcome, makes no difference Ted.

YOU REMOVED THE POSTS, using a third party instead of an iPhone.

And we all know why.

At no time was I pushing my products, but rather, making it obvious the fallacies inherent in the objectivist approach.

This is total BS, and the advertorial platforms disguised as threads you removed contained evidence of you doing exactly that, hence. you scurrying to the mods to get them nuked once this thread started gaining momentum,

Pathetic Ted, pathetic. It’s people like you who give subjectivists a really bad rap and make us an easy target for objectivist propaganda. We don’t need people like you out there putting profit before ethics. Get you cash machine off our bandwagon..

You would be better off educating the folks here by explaining how you developed the products you sell and how they can help improve the sound of the reader’s systems.

not really - on his website all he does is demonstrate that he hasn’t got a friggin’ clue what ‘quantum tunnelling’ actually is, but that magic Q word sells stuff..

associating bad pseudo-science with subjectivism only weakens its stance. If your cables sound good, they sound good, no need for fairy tales..

Go Thumper … Go  😎

@cleeds

Do you really sweep all objective thinking members here into your facile little box with “ They pretend to know how things sound without ever actually listening to them”

Are you seriously suggesting that these folk don’t actually listen to their systems on an organic,  corporeal level … Utterly Pathetic