2. amps-preamps
  3. 174711-30411

CLASS D MONO AMPS buy ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS

CLASS D AMPLIFIER TECHNOLOGY HAS FINALLY ARRIVED TO OUTPERFORM ALL OTHER TOPOLOGIES 

The Amplifier is the New Class D Mono Amps using GaN Fets in a unique Patented
Circlotronic output stage…Design by Ralph Karsten of ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS 

Rated at 100 watts 8 ohms and 200 watts 4 ohms with low distortion across the full audio bandwidth with excellent noise characteristics 

I have been using ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS MA-1 3.0 with all factory upgrades along with NOS 6NS7 Input Tubes for many years 

The New ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS CLASS D has outperformed my MA-1 3.0 in all areas…the resolution and transparency are simply an Amazing Accomplishment

Also I sold my MP-3 mk 3.0 and purchased the New MP-3 mk3.3

In my Audio opinion I believe the ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS CLASS D MONO AMPS used with the MP-3 mk3.3 will offer one of the most transparent sounding electronics combinations to date…only using the MP-1 mk3.3 will offer more performance 

I have used other High End Amplifiers in my system and the ATMASPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS CLASS D MONO AMPS outperformed all of them as well

Music Lover…Audiophile…Retired Audio/Video Engineer over 45 years 

Thanks for Reading 

TubeGuy 45

tubeguy45
kuribo
524 posts
 

Ultimately, there is no debating opinions. The only thing that can be debated are facts

Actually, its the other way around

@noske Hahaha. Touche. And precisely correct.

Debate is best done using facts to support a position. When the position one is trying to support is not capable of a factual defense, there can be no rationale debate.

invalid
1,185 posts
 

Debate is best done using facts to support a position. When the position one is trying to support is not capable of a factual defense, there can be no rationale debate.

 

 

That’s not true these days consensus is now part of science.

kuribo
524 posts
 

That’s not true these days consensus is now part of science.

 

A consensus doesn't mean it's rationale nor does it mean it's factual. If it's not based on fact it's just an opinion, regardless.

Post removed 
berner99
216 posts
 

 

invalid

463 posts

That’s not true these days consensus is now part of science.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not real science, though you might think so by the groupthink passing as science today. Science makes real progress by people taking contrarian views, taking on conventional wisdom

Example 1: Ask the person who put forward the hypothesis that bacteria cause stomach ulcers. No one believed him until he infected himself and then cured himself.

Example 2: quote from Nobel prize winning physicist Max Planck:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

 

More to discover