I own a Selection of Vintage DD TT's, included in this collection have been three TTS 8000's of which two are still retained.
I have a selection of Platter Mats produced from different materials and use these regularly to detect if improvements can be made with a mechanical interface by swapping Platter Mat material.
For me the TTS 8000 has been a great TT, but not as the basic functioning TT supplied by the Manufacturer and then via how many other owners?
It has been great as serving the purpose to be used as a donor model, to be worked with to make changes to the original designs put in place for it and have the designs produced to deliver improvements over the original design and remove some of the concerning mechanical interfaces that have been met when the TT is kept as per the original.
If a TTS 8000 has shown signs of some of the known design concerns, this would in my view not be a TT that would have time spent on it trying to improve on the interfaces, by making minor changes using standalone third party ancillary devices. I would be more inclined to learn how to have the TT perform in a manner that is with a selection on improved mechanical interfaces.
It would only be then that any choices made for the use of a Third Party Ancillary Device would place the device in an environment that can allow it to show of the qualities that can create an attraction toward it.