TT speed


When I use a protractor to align the stylus I do the alignment at the inside, and then rotate the platter maybe 20 degree when I move the arm to the outside of the LP, or protractor.

On a linear tracking “arm” it would not need to rotate at all.

At 33-1/3, then 15 minutes would be about 500 rotations. And that 20 degrees would be a delay of 18th of a rotation.

So a 1 kHz tone would be about 0.11 Hz below 1000.
It is not much, but seems kind of interesting... maybe?

128x128holmz

I am sure it doesn’t matter, but unless the track is running in a circle, the pivoting arm will produce a very slight chirp in the tone.

The example of a linear tracker with a moving overhang is obviously not something that one buys… but it was yet another example to convey the effect of what is happening with the arm, that makes the platter look like it is advancing or retarding as the arm moves inwards.

What was an “ah ha” moment for me, was obviously not shared well or described too clearly.

Everywhere at any point on this LP, the 1000Hz test tone has been encoded by a perfect cutter lathe.  In practice, the stylus tip is just a point on the surface of the LP; it doesn't "know" where it was a fraction of a second before or after any particular event.  How can this phenomenon change the fundamental frequency?  

The cutter lathe is moving in a straight line.

A pivoted arm is moving in an arc.

They are not congruent.

Does your direct drive turntable speed up and down to bridge the gap on each rotation ?

 It also disproves your fantasy that phono cartridge tangency affects frequency. 

I have never claimed that.

What I have said is that the stylus on a pivoted arm, for each 1.8 seconds, deviates from the position of the cutter head at the same time interval.

Frequency is a red herring because the deviation would be so small it would probably be less than that generated by normal tt issues around stability.

 

I am the OP, so it was my fantasy not @dover .

It is not “tangency”, but the walking of the point across the platter dues the arc of the tone arm.

But as was pointed out in the very opening post it amounts to “a bee’s phallus” amount of shift… I used the term, “it is not much”.

(Where “Bee’s _ick” is the Australian slang term for “a small and almost immeasurable amount”. I believe that the UK uses the acronym of “SFA”.)

 

My main claim was that I found it “somewhat interesting”.

What is more interesting now, is that we do not agree whether it is truely happening, or just a fantasy.
And also that my communication likely uses a lot of body language and hand motion to describe physical things.